BigFatBuddha

Carry on, fat buddhaman! -Susan Mason

It is not the Buddha that carries on, but the on that carries Buddha. -◈▣◈

ROFL -Susan Mason

When you ROFL, the world ROFLs with you. -◈▣◈

Please could you add some latin characters to your sig, so we can read your name when you sign? -Tarquin

Your nature is reflected within your question. -◈¡◈

"Long live the Gang of Four! Long live Chairman Mao!" - Oh shit, I thought it was just a sig... -&#35918&#30505sv

It is at the moment when one ceases awareness of shit, that it is most likely to be stepped in. -◈¡◈

远看不是屎，近看不是屎，捡起来看还不是屎，放在嘴里尝一尝才领悟是屎。 -Beiguo

Only by tasting it may we avoid stepping in it. -◈¡◈

My browser doesn't see the chinese figures. I don't want you to quit using them, I just wanna know how I can see them. -Susan Mason

A browser that sees is like a dog that talks, the fact that it exists is more disturbing than what it has to say. -◈¡◈

One cannot visit www.netscape.com twice and still get the same thing. -Beiguo

Can one visit it once and get the same thing? -◈¡◈

Could you refrain from using words like "whitewash" to describe the work of others? That word implies an intent to mislead and downplay negative aspects of something. When it is used against a user who did not have such an intention it is likely to lead to hurt feelings. -mav

Does intent to wag lie in the tail, the dog, or the boy with the food? -◈¡◈

I'm jealous that you're BigFatBuddha and I'm not. Best wishes. -Arthur

I too am jealous that you are not BigFatBuddha. -◈¡◈

尼甫言 男人挑女人上田 男人有安上土 -&#35918&#30505sv

I'm not that kind of Buddha. -◈¡◈

Fat Buddha, why a mouse when in spins? -Tarquin

The walrus barks "higher is fewer". -◈¡◈

なつのはなは だれのはいくですか -ち き

Sodesune -◈¡◈

I shall add, this beast hates the Soul. -Wanli

Take care that the beast does not destroy the man in you. -◈¡◈

In my opinion, the underlying picture should only be changed if it's a better quality version of the same thing. -Martin

How can things change for the better if they stay the same? -◈¡◈

Why do you change between Unicode 161 (¡) and 9635 (▣) for your nose? -Geoffrey

Because Tarquin asked me to. -◈¡◈

Thanks for adding that map of Iraq. It really helps us visualize the places named in the 2003 invasion of Iraq article. -Uncle Ed

I am humbly corrected. My map does nothing to help visualize places. It only helps to visualize a map. -◈¡◈

When you're paddling down the street in your canoe, and the wheels fall off, how many pancakes does it take to make a doghouse? -Stephen Gilbert

Only one, but the pancake must be doghouse shaped to begin with. -◈¡◈

Is it the Buddha who is big and fat, or is it the Buddha's fat that is big? -Stephen Gilbert

It is not the Buddha that is BigFat, but the nature of Buddha that is BigFat. -◈¡◈

I don't think that it is a good idea for you to change other people's comments. Perhaps you should change them back. -snoyes

There are many things that should perhaps be done, but far fewer that ever will be. -◈¡◈

Oh BigFatBuddha, are not the words that I speak jewels to be treasured? -Martin

Indeed Martin, they sparkle in the light and provide wealth to the beholder. -◈¡◈

If Bush speaks in a forest, and there is no liberal there to hear, is he still wrong? -Uncle Ed

Only if he speaks the words of Clinton. -◈¡◈

How do you know that Buddha was a Buddhist? -◈¡◈

If Buddha was, then Bodhi was not what you thought it was. -Usedbook

Code point 0x1B3C is undefined. Please enlighten me with the zen behind the unreadable signature! -67.117.82.5

Do you believe that sixty-nine equals ninety-six? -◈¡◈

That which is softly secured is nevertheless secured. -Martin

As with cheese, there are many levels of firmness. -◈¡◈

And yet the hardest cheese is not the best cheese. -Stephen Gilbert

The protected cheese may only be eaten by superusers, the rest cannot comment on the flavor. -◈¡◈

Nice addition to Freedom fries. -Kingturtle

Is not the name of a thing a different thing then the thing? -◈¡◈

I am what I am, and Tannin is what he is, and I was unaware that we were the same person. -Martin

While we may all be the same in the great wheel of life, this was just a BadBuddhism. -◈¡◈

I appreciate the effort on the SARS table, but it still looks big to me. -Someone Else

Perhaps it would look smaller if you stood further from your monitor? -◈¡◈

Why is anti-Americanism the fault of Americans, while anti-Francism is also the fault of the Americans? -Zoe

You have tickled the Buddha inside. -◈¡◈

A wheat plant growing in a corn field is a weed. -Anthere

Even a corn plant growing in a corn field is a weed, if it is the wrong sort of corn. -◈¡◈

The Buddha is more man than I! -John Owens

The Man is more I than Buddha. -◈¡◈

Good work on the First Lady proposal. Sometimes we hit days and pages were you see dreadful articles and petty squabbles and feel like giving up on wiki. Then you find a gem of an article that is really being worked on professionally and in an intelligent thought-provoking manner and the wiki experience suddenly feels well worth it again!!! I am stuck in the middle of something else right now so I cannot give it the attention it needs, but I will get back to you. Well done. ÉÍREman 01:46 Apr 24, 2003 (UTC)

meditation on your question continues...

Are you removing all instances of "refers to"? -Camembert

Not all, only some, and perhaps poorly. -◈¡◈

Why? Is it offensive to some cultures? Is it against the law in Botswana? Is there some reason we should all know about, as to why we should avoid "refers to" when we write articles? -- Tim Starling 04:07 Apr 25, 2003 (UTC)

---

Hi Buddha, I don't really understand why you are making so many agriculture type things into redirects. I don't really agree with the sentiment to, for example, your summary for your Biosphere III edit of Since there is nothing here,"Biosphere III" can just be a subtopic within Biosphere. Biosphere and Biosphere III (and indeed Biosphere I and II) are not the same things. In the goodness of time an article about the concept of Biosphere III will be written, I think that Biosphere III not showing up as an empty article can only slow this process down. It's like redirecting football to sport, yes, football is a sport, but what would be the use of the redirect? In a similar way Intensive agriculture would in the goodness of time have its own article, why is it more useful to redirect Intensive agriculture to Agriculture than to have an empty link out from Agriculture to Intensive Agriculture? I'm genuinely interested in this, I think maybe I'm missing the point. Cheers, Ams80 20:59 Apr 25, 2003 (UTC)

this redirect is double stupid, since I did a intensive farming which is clearly the article to which intensive agriculture should be redirected. And shows quite clearly how stupid how most of the redirects budda made are.

As for why agri articles, it is quite simple. Budda went through some list I intended to fill (or to be filled by others) in sustainable agriculture List of sustainable agriculture topics. A few hours ago, this list had about half of the items empty, nice topics to fill for the pleasure of those interested by this topic. Now, all the articles are linked, half of them being linked stupidely. Budda also did the same to some of the articles I recently edited. Each time of link was empty, he added a meaningless redirect. Also did a couple of stupid edits, such as the one you mention. I am glad others noticed.

So the missing point is : let's have a good time on anthere, to make her suffer from daring to complain on articles such as anti-french sentiment, or just maybe because I am french, or just because he is bored. This serie of stupid redirections is just personal revenge. That's the benefit against ruining people work and potentially good encyclopedia. Budda is just a vandal. User:anthere