Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Beslan school hostage crisis/archive1
Appearance
Not a self-nom. This article went through a turbulent period in the couple of months after 1 September 2004, but has been pretty stable since November 2004, and looks quite good to me. One slight weakness is the descent into short one-sentence paragraphs towards the end, which I will try to address now. Another weakness is references, but I suspect that a large number of the "External links" are references. I doubt that there is much on paper yet (reportage? press coverage?). -- ALoan (Talk) 13:00, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- support -- I remember the disputes as it was written as the crisis evolved, and this is certainly a case where many eyes scrutinized the articles factuality. The lack of printed references is not an problem in this case imho, but it would be nice to have a photograph of the siege (but I suppose they're all copyrighted by press agencies?) dab (ᛏ) 14:29, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)