Jump to content

Recursive largest first algorithm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Curb Safe Charmer (talk | contribs) at 11:52, 5 January 2022 (Curb Safe Charmer moved page Draft:Recursive largest first algorithm to Recursive largest first algorithm: Publishing accepted Articles for creation submission (AFCH 0.9.1)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Recursive Largest First (RLF) algorithm is a heuristic for the NP-hard graph coloring problem. It was originally proposed by Frank Leighton in 1979.[1]

The RLF algorithm assigns colors to a graph’s vertices by constructing each color class one at a time. It does this by identifying an independent set of vertices in the graph, assigning these to the same color, and then removing these vertices from the graph. These actions are repeated on the remaining subgraph until no vertices remain.

To try and form high-quality solutions (solutions using as few colors as possible), the RLF algorithm uses specialized heuristics to identify "good quality" independent sets. These heuristics make the RLF algorithm exact for bipartite, cycle, and wheel graphs.[2] In general, however, the algorithm is approximate, and may well return solutions using more colors than the graph’s chromatic number.

Description

The algorithm can be described by the following three steps. At the end of this process, gives a partition of the vertices representing a feasible -colouring of the graph .

  1. Let be an empty solution, and let be the graph we wish to color, comprising a vertex set and an edge set .
  2. Identify a maximal independent set . To do this:
    1. The first vertex added to should be the vertex in that has the largest number of neighbors.
    2. Subsequent vertices added to should be chosen as those that are (a) not currently adjacent to any vertex in , and (b) have a maximal number of neighbors that are adjacent to vertices in . Ties in condition (b) can be broken by selecting the vertex with the minimum number of neighbors not in . Vertices are added to in this way until it is impossible to add further vertices.
  3. Now set and remove the vertices of from . If still contains vertices, then return to Step 2; otherwise end.

Example

A wheel graph with seven vertices

Consider the graph shown on the right. This is a wheel graph and will therefore be optimally colored by RLF. Executing the algorithm results in the vertices being selected and colored in the following order:

  1. Vertex (color 1)
  2. Vertex , , and then (color 2)
  3. Vertex , , and then (color 3)

This gives the final three-colored solution .

Performance

Let be the number of vertices in the graph and be the number of colors. Using big O notation, in his original publication Leighton states the complexity of RLF to be ; however, this can be improved upon. Much of the expense of this algorithm is due to Step 2, where vertex selection is made according to the heuristic rules stated above. Indeed, each time a vertex is selected for addition to the independent set , information regarding the neighbors needs to be recalculated for each uncolored vertex. These calculations can be performed in time, meaning that the overall complexity of RLF is .[2]

If the heuristics of Step 2 are replaced with random selection, then the complexity is reduced to ; however, this will usually return lower quality solutions compared to those of RLF.[2]

In an empirical comparison by Lewis in 2021, RLF was shown to produce significantly better vertex colorings than alternative heuristics such as the greedy algorithm and the DSatur algorithm on random graphs. However, runtimes with RLF were also seen to be higher due to its higher overall complexity.[2]

References

  1. ^ Leighton, F. (1979). "A graph coloring algorithm for large scheduling problems". Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. 84: 489–503.
  2. ^ a b c d e Lewis, R. (2021). A Guide to Graph Colouring: Algorithms and Applications. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81054-2. ISBN 978-3-030-81053-5.