User talk:PikDig

Philippine Airlines

Well I guess your right…. i understand .tnx

Recent Attempted Move of Charrrmed (Charmed episode)

Hi there. You recently attempted to correct the title of this page. Unfortunately, you tried to copy/paste the article to the new title instead of using the move function. Pages cannot simply be copy/pasted, because that destroys the edit history of the article. The article will be placed on Wikipedia:Requested moves in order to get it to the correct name. I redirected the new article back to the current title until the move can be completed properly. Please don't change the redirect until this is sorted out. Thanks. —MiraLuka 03:35, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Northwest Airlines

Northwest Airlines uses a spoke-hub system for its flights within the U.S., as you well know. It obviously extends this system outside the U.S., as you indicated to your edits to Newark Liberty International Airport and John F. Kennedy International Airport, among others. But these "international" flights are transcontinental flights that do not extend too far from the U.S. It is not unreasonable to say that your "international" flights are merely extensions of the U.S. domestic system for Northwest.

Also, as I pointed out at Talk:Newark Liberty International Airport#Edmonton?, your "direct" flights may not connect. Why would you list a 1-stop flight that would not connect at that one stop? Today, look up yesterday's (July 27) flight status of flight 1019 at nwa.com. Had the flight been direct, at Minneapolis, passengers from Newark would be guaranteed a connection at Minneapolis to go to Edmonton. Am I right or am I wrong? And, anyway, it just seems to be a coincidence that there is such a flight number from Newark to Edmonton. There is no direct flight from Edmonton to Newark, would you agree?

I'm not a member of the Wikiproject Airports, but I know from common sense when a destination should be listed and when one should not. I'm not going to revert your edits yet. Tinlinkin 12:02, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Narnia

Hello, I noticed that you edited an article related to, or expressed interest in The Chronicles of Narnia. I thought you may be interested in knowing that there is a WikiProject working to improve articles about Narnia, your help would be greatly appreciated. Please consider joining the WikiProject Narnia. Thank you! Bornagain4 18:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Transporation on Singapore Wikimania bid

Hello, its great that you would like to help. Just send me an email or drop a note on my talk page. Do it quick though. Thanks :) --Ter e nce Ong _{(T | C)} 09:58, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: parentheses vs. brackets

We've used brackets traditionally to set apart "seasonal" and start dates so as not to present confusing subsets of parentheses. Any reason you changed it? FCYTravis 06:02, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Newark International Airport

I have reverted your edit to Newark International Airport because all of your changes are not compliant with the style for Wikipedia Airport Pages. NcSchu 15:16, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

go!Express

I noticed that you changed the Honolulu International Airport, Kahului Airport, and other Hawaii airport articles to reflect Mokulele Airlines flights as go!Express. While Mokulele's site lists go! flights, the Mokulele flights don't appear bookable on go!'s site yet and their PDF timetable also doesn't reflect the go!Express flights. Until there is some indication that the service has actually started, I don't think we should be listing Mokulele flights as go!Express. -- Hawaiian717 16:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Manila vs Angeles

Please obtain consensus on Talk:Singapore Changi Airport#Tiger flies to Manila, not "Angeles_City" before attempting to move Clark flights to "Angeles City" again. Jpatokal 14:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You asked for a reply, there it is: ↑. See also Wikipedia talk:Airline destination lists: Asia. Jpatokal 14:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manila airports

Please continue the discussion on the project talk page. My talk page is not the best place. It is not a decision that one or two editors can make. Everyone who wants to participate on the talk page can contribute with a consensus name for listing both airports being the result of that discussion. Vegaswikian 08:35, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

KE ICN-CEB-ICN

Hey Chris. The guy is correct. KE will start to fly 6631/6632 ICN-CEB-ICN starting this week. I decided to just leave the guy alone this time. I believe it will start to fly this Sunday. Cheers. /ɪlεktʃɹɪk bluː/ 16:27, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BKK not disambiguated on SIN article and faux-direct destination constantly added for United Airlines

Hey PikDig. One user has been constantly leaving Bangkok undisambiguated to leaving as "Bangkok" and not "Bangkok-Suvarnabhumi". They just think that ALL INTERNATIONAL flights go to Suvarnabhumi and just leaving it as Bangkok. Thai Airways International fly to both Don Mueang and Suvarnabhumi so we need to disambiguate those to avoid confusion. What do you think? Should we disambiguate Bangkok or not? Also that user also keeps readding Atlanta as a destination to United supposedly that UA flies from Singapore to Atlanta directly. Should Atlanta remain or be removed? Thanks a bunch! Bucs2004 19:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed Atlanta on the SIN article since UA flight 896 from ORD-ATL is a Boeing 737. I just hope is not readded again. Bucs2004 20:13, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

----

Hello I've been constantly fixing flights in LaGuardia Airport, also in JFK International Airport. Please stop I understand but these are correct I'm a pilot for United Airlines so I know what I'm talking about. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Smartboy67 (talk • contribs) 20:04, 24 April 2007.

Dipolog Airport

"Thanks for the reminder. I already did cited my source at their respective links. Additional informations are added based on interviews and documentary evidence i obtained from concerned government officials. NOt all documentary sources can be found online, and some are quoted from copyrighted materials I read which are also the source of those links which are also the basis of those news items. Best efforts are made to trace the presence of this documents on the web as source of information for transparency. There are still plenty of additional information to add. I myself is a government official who happens to live and stay in Dipolog. I also happen to know what copyright law is. That's why I know what I'm talking about. I don't hide my name either. Best regards." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ariel c nunag (talk • contribs) 00:08, 6 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Tweed destinations and airports

See Discussion on Tweed Airport page for reply to your removal of destinations. InkQuill 02:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dipolog

Hey chris, can you do the honours for me please! I'm not so good at encyclopedic writing.Thank you.--Ariel c nunag 11:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected it to almost an encyclopeadic version. Its the best that I can do. If other paragraphs are still identical to news item, please do the honors to correct it. Readers deserve the right to know this information you know. If not, then I supposed I don't have to forced the issue. E-mail me for other concerns. Thank you very much.Ariel c nunag 17:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]