Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panorama Stitchers, Viewers and Utilities

Panorama Stitchers, Viewers and Utilities

This page is about stitchers, viewers and utilities not panorama photography in general. Panoramic photography The reference to Equirectangular projection is about map projections not panorama photography hence the direct reference to the PanoTools wiki. I don't see the point having separate promotional pages (not allowed anyways) and keep in the spirit of the Wikipedia offering factual non-biased information. I think the reaction to this page is more hurt feelings buy a vendor then what's best for the community. BTW: There isn't one link or refencence to the PanoTools group on the Panorama Tools page or this new page that is a little over a day old. All I hear from the pro-NG editors here is complaints but no contributions. Let's put some of that energy into the articles instead for a change.
John Spikowski 09:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For all the reasons given below and copied here from the talk page. -- RHaworth 09:38, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the entire article is in this form useless and not relevant (see Wikipedia:Relevance) because all topics are covered already on other pages at Wikipedia (like Panoramic photography, Equirectangular projection, QuickTime, PanoTools, Hugin...) and this is an encyclopedia not a tutorial page , overview or feature comparison (see WP:NOT). Also the text is just copy and pasted from other wiki pages. As all of us that followed John Spikowski know, the final goal is to add 5 links to panotools.info to this page and to create another battle ground as John demonstrated in the past (PanoTools Group (history link [1]), contributions, talk page archive,talk page). -- Wuz 13:56, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]