Jump to content

Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/September 5

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Votes for deletion
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TakuyaMurata (talk | contribs) at 16:57, 6 September 2003 (move my entry to sep 6). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

September 5

  • Paul Watson. Just seems to be a personal attack by User:JasonSpaulding. Angela 02:05, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)
    • I think the stub version you had earlier is fine, we just need to keep the POV out of it. - Hephaestos 02:11, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)
      • It might need protecting then as he's added the same (possibly libelous) content four times in the last two days. Angela 02:15, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)
  • Center for Mental Health Services and CMHS. I don't know anything about this subject to know if any of this information is correct, but this POV article cannot stand. RickK 02:45, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)
    • VfD is not for listing POV articles. Martin 09:45, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)
      • It is when removing the POV from the article would leave an article that would be a candidate for deletion. In this case I get to "The Center for Mental Health Services is a US government-supported group." as the NPOV core of the article, which is sub-stub in my opinion. Andre Engels 12:06, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)
  • List of religious topics (G-M), List of religious topics (N-S), List of religious topics (T-Z) - I subdivided List of religious topics into 4 chunks a couple weeks ago; this was unnecessary, as the full list (A-Z) is not that long - it just LOOKED long! - so I have recombined them into the one original article. Harris7 05:34, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)
    • Hey guys, I'm a new admin...I assume the 3 pages above are candidates for instant deletion, and do not require any lengthy discussion? dave
    • Might as well just redirect them. Martin 09:41, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)
      • That's generally a good idea, but I think in this case, it's not really necessary if there are no links left to the split-up pages. I doubt anyone'll stumble upon them otherwise, especially without coming across the recombined article first. -- Schnee 14:16, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)
  • Kathy Watt - I think being the daughter of a semi-famous person (who does not even have a Wikipedia entry yet) does not justify having a Wikipedia entry of one's own. -- Schnee 13:07, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)
    • Has been further edited by the same person to tell that she's a cyclist. Andre Engels 21:00, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)
  • The Plug Comic, Chunkee the Monkey, and related - no hits on Google other than ours. - Hephaestos 18:19, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)
    • What about this one, for example? ([1] ) Just search on Google for "plug comic" with the quotes, and you'll get it as the first hit. The article may still have to be deleted, since it seems to be a verbatim copy of that page, but the comic itself seems to have existed. -- Schnee 18:26, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)
      • Thanks for the link. I was concerned due to the vandalism that it might not have been a legit topic, now I know it's legit. - Hephaestos 18:33, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)
        • No problem, you're welcome. :) -- Schnee 00:10, 6 Sep 2003 (UTC)
    • Chunkee the Monkey gets only 1 Google hit (the one above) that isn't from Wikipedia or a Wikipedia-derived source... I question its continuing presence... :-) Evercat 14:46, 6 Sep 2003 (UTC)
  • Sir Thomas Browne - a rambling screed whose point, I gather, is that one should not refer to the Jacobean prose writer as "Sir". Any useful material should be integrated into the existing article Thomas Browne. -- llywrch 22:39, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/September_5&oldid=1403203"