User talk:Asbestos

——————————————— ASBESTOS: TALK ———————————————

Please, add new entries to the bottom and don't forget to sign your name by typing four tildes: ~~~~.

country infoboxes

Hi, there's a new Solution E that's been proposed for the country infoboxes; I've changed my vote from the Solution D that I proposed, earlier. The new option, proposed by User:Zocky, transcludes a subpage instead of using the template mechanism for this.

See: Nepal's infobox is implemented at Nepal/infobox using Template:Infobox_Country; Tuvalu's is implemented at Tuvalu/infobox as a wiki table.

Discussion is at: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Countries

voting: Wikipedia:Country_infobox_vote

Thanks. — Davenbelle 02:39, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)

He's back

Asbestos- Rananim is back and is using a cable/wireless account to edit the OWU entry. [[User:Stude62|user: stude62 talk:stude62]] 02:35, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Asbestos - Is there anyway that I can send you an email?

VfD / Ohio Wesleyan Buildings

I agree the phrasing of my vote may seem strange. It comes from the fact that VfD has only one of two outcomes - Delete or not ("Keep"). What happens after something is not deleted (say a merge and redirect) is secondary. I vote this way to ensure my vote is clear. -- Netoholic @ 19:05, 2005 Jan 20 (UTC)

user talk

I think you might have missed a "user" in the page name here. --fvw * 01:56, 2005 Jan 22 (UTC)

I did, just fixed it. I sent you an email today at an address that I found for you, did you get it? user: stude62 user talk:stude62 01:59, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Thanks! (and a question)

Appreciate the kind greeting and the helpful links; I 'cut my teeth' on a miniWiki for the LiveJournal community milliways_bar so was somewhat familiar with the formatting before I plunged in here.

I do need some help, though -- I'm adding information to some pages linked to Sailor_Moon, and can't figure out how to add them to the section demarcated as SMoon inside a double pair of curly brackets. I finally got the category link sorted out, though (that was a little tricky, didn't expect it to be case-sensitive).

Sffcorgi 11:52, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

E/T/A: The template I'm trying to edit is {{SMoon}}; I'm trying to add the links for Sailor Heavy Metal Papillon, Sailor Pewter Fox and Sailor Titan Kerokko.

VOD Wesleyan Buildings

Asbestos-

How long will the Wesleyan Building stay on Votes for delation. Plamen is back, this time as Rananim - what does wikipedia do if he votes to keep the articles using all of his identities? I take it you have seen his web page? user: stude62 user talk:stude62 14:02, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hey Asbestos, thanks for the welcome. I hope I can get used to the formatting of these posts and stuff. Jasonnaas 02:21, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)

Yesss! [punch air]

That was EXACTLY what help I needed -- I couldn't quite get the syntax right on my own, nor could I find a tutorial page for assistance. Thanks again.

Corgi 08:40, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)

VfD/Ohio Wesleyan buildings

Hi Dbenbenn — thanks for merging the information in the articles to Ohio Wesleyan University. One question: several people (including myself) noted that the pages that were being voted on would have the wrong title even if kept ("Wesleyan" being the name of any number of different universities). As it is, these are the articles that have now been turned into redirects, and thus the redirects still have incorrect titles. Should I just go ahead and move them to their correct titles? Thanks, — Asbestos | Talk 23:42, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Hi Asbestos, I think the easiest thing to do is just make redirects from whatever pages you think need them. Alternatively, you could move, for example, Elliott Hall, Wesleyan to Elliott Hall, Ohio Wesleyan, but that would just result in a redirect at Elliott Hall, Wesleyan pointing to Elliott Hall, Ohio Wesleyan. Redirects are cheap, so having a redirect from the wrong title isn't really a problem. Cheers, dbenbenn | talk 00:10, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Looking back at the VfD, you wrote "As far as I understand, a merge doesn't usually imply a redirect". I'm pretty sure that's wrong. The GFDL requires that if you merge text from X to Y, then you have to keep the page history of X. Thus, a vote of "merge and delete" just means "merge", because it can't be deleted after the merge. dbenbenn | talk 00:30, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Medical analysis of circumcision

I thought that you needed to have it explained why O'Hara and Bensley/Boyle are not considered suitable for inclusion in the article.

See the following for discussion on Bensley/Boyle:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Medical_analysis_of_circumcision/Archive_2#Bensley.2FBoyle_survey

For the simple explanation of why the O'Hara survey is unaccepatble see the last paragraph of that link.

I trust you will now let matters be and cease to try and force unscientific trash in Wikipedia articles. Thanking you in anticipation. - Robert the Bruce 20:42, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Asbestos, this is left in reply to a comment left on my user talk page.

I have no objections to the inclusion of the Cochrane HIV report (though I may have reservations over the wording - rather than a balanced report some individuals seem intent upon extracting the few sentences or partial sentences that support their POV). However, I do object to the O'Hara "study" being included - it's clearly nonsense, and the article is better off without it. If it must be referenced, I will ensure that the version you and I agreed upon is included rather than the wild anti-circ POV version. However, I will not act to the detriment of Wiki or the article, which I feel reincluding that paragraph would do. - Jakew 00:29, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

welcoming users

We're trying out a new bootcamp system to introduce users to wikipedia in an active, more friendly way.

I noticed you adding welcome messages yesterday; can you add a {{bootcamp}} reference when you greet new users?

Cheers, +sj + 04:02, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Yep, templates work fine one level deep. If you come to a bootcamp you can learn more about templates :-) +sj +

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Stude62

I don't mean to engage you in any discussion about this because I am better of minimizing contact with you. I saw you signed the page for comments on Stude62. I know you are a smart guy, so you could see his accusations or lies about me making the Wesleyan page to my liking and making it POV. Please take a look at my 12 or so edits for the past 5 days of that page and let me know if his claims about me making the page subjective are correct. If so, what edits are subjective. Then, feel free to post that what he says are not lies. Thanks. Pnikolov 02:07, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

It is remarkable to note that if we don't think alike about this issue than we are coming closer to each other than we ever did on any other issue. I signed the RfC because I think there is enough evidence, given the 4 claims listed, that he has violated certain Wiki rules. As far as I am concerned, I stand by my calling him a liar. Perhaps me calling him a "liar" is not the most diplomatic of ways to deal with a person.

I saw you disagreed. Take a look at his "and now its been edited to Plamen's liking, not facts. Again, I'm just trying to ensure that entry is factual and correct for everyone, not just one persons feelings" and "Pnikolov is again beginning to remove and adjust facts to suit his personal version of what is right and correct, which has dominated this article since last fall and keeps pulling the article in a direction to suit one person and his view, not NPOV". I am sure there are other comments that he posted, I just don't want to waste time and look for them. I challenged him to show me ONE EDIT BY ME that fits "my feelings" and is "not NPOV". Since his accusations do not match reality, I think his claims are a lie. Has the definition of that word changed recently?

Furthermore, in the future, I don't want to make factual changes to an article and see them disappear because he thinks that the changes are subjective and/or POV but he can not prove his claims. That's counterproductive. Not just for me but for anyone else contributing to Wikipedia. Plus, there are other users who make changes to the Wesleyan article and to other articles that he edits and they have felt the same way I did.

I don't think user:Stude62 would want to revert my edits from the last few days because it would not only be very unwise of him to do so but it would also be equivalent, literally and figuratively, to Wiki "vandalizing", which is even worse than the 4 Wiki rules he has violated so far.

About his contribtions: if you compare what the Wesleyan page looked like a month ago and now, you would notice almost no difference in substance. There is a structural change which has nothing to do with a change in substance; the order of sections is different and the focus of each section is different but the information is essentially 99% the same. One section is missing and merged with other sections. He deleted one or two claims published by various publications because he thought they were "old" or "immaterial". And now there are a lot of sentences that I earlier called "anemic"(a random sentence or idea that comes out of the blue or is not fleshed out, etc). Now, that hardly qualifies as making the page NPOV. And it certainly doesn't justify him posting messages on just about every administrator's page that he knows that users (including me) change the article to a "subjective" format. What's worse is that his accusations effectively stop users who want to improve the page...and that's something that you don't want.

You said "I think he is still stubborn, still POV-pushing and still prone to using sock-puppets". I think the right word here is perseverant. There is nothing perversely unyielding about my reasoning. If changes make sense, I am ready to accept them. You can follow my early arguments with User:Stude62 to see this. I discussed the POV point above. Your last claim is so murky and so not on target that it doesn't deserve any discussion.

Btw, I hope my edits on my username page have cleared any confusion in anyone's mind about PNikolov/Rananim.

Pnikolov 21:30, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Espresso

Hi Asbestos, I am Italian and I can guarantee you that espresso comes from Latin ex premĕre (doh, I think); the Italian verb esprimere's past participle is indeed irregular and is "espresso". It is normally used in sentences as Gli ho espresso le mie preoccupazioni ("I expressed him my concers"), which is consistent with the idea of "getting something out". The irregularity is awkward since there are other similar verbs, as "premere" and "spremere" that have plain and regular past participles.

There is no immediate connection between espresso and speed, except express trains. However, these trains are no longer used in Italy anyway, since they changed the name to InterCity in order to be more expensive. :-(

Express trains, in turn, got their name originally because they were "pushed" through less important stations, stopping only at larger hubs. Orzetto 14:54, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

WikiMagic

Thanks for letting me know, and I'm glad you could join. I don't expect you to be hyperactive. I'm unvolved in far too much other stuff myself. Happy editing! Mgm|^(talk) 08:22, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)

Name change and User Page

I have redirected references on user:Pnikolov to go automatically to user:Rananim to avoide confusion. I have also changed my template after borrowing some of the form ideas from yours. I hope you do not mind. If you do, let me know and I will change it. Rananim 00:48, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Get your ass out of my edits!!

Stop vandalizing my edits! If wikipedia wont allow me to edit freely then I wont edit at all!!!! There was no reason for you to revert my entry on the list of Egyptians page. You probably just did it because some other editor friend told you to!!! what do u know about famous egyptians anyway??! Get a life!!!
What you called vandalism was me reverting my contributions to this trashcan, because honestly I wont edit of a resource that finds fart fetishism a notable subject and rejects other truly notable subjects because most lousy perverted wikipedia users are narrow minded.
What are you here for to push an agenda? or to create a truly comprehensive encyclopedia? Omar Filini 11:02, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

ThankYou

I'm not sure I've understood the ~.

No I have! Thanks a lot. I haven't seen anything like this before: Wikipedia's potentiality is huge. I love it Entropia 14:44, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)

2004 Indian Ocean earthquake

hey why are you erasing my posts!

I know its nowhere near perfect, but if its not up, nobodys going to be able to veiw and edit it and condese, Im just the messanger, wiki is your domain, all I ask is you please read all, and post was you feel relevant, thanks. - 198.53.203.36.

Anon edits

Thanks for your message! I have now created an account and am currently testing how to use it. — JIP | Talk 08:49, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Kiltnballs

Hi Angr — this is just a heads-up that I've listed Image:Kiltnballs.JPG at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion as it was orphaned (no articles link to it), out-of-focus, and appears to be unencyclopedic. If you think otherwise, feel free to say so there or at my talk page. — Asbestos | Talk 19:31, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hey Abestos, that's cool. It was at Kilt#Underwear, where I felt it was relevant to the topic under discussion, but someone removed it a few days ago on grounds of being in poor taste. Whatever. I won't vote to keep it. --Angr 19:41, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Wonders of the World

Category: Wonders of the World (discussion) is listed on CfD again. You voted for its deletion the last time it was listed there so you may want to vote so again. See Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Category:Wonders of the World. – Kpalion (talk) 09:14, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

No problem

I saw him add spam to penis earlier so decided to check on his contributes and undid the last bit of vandalism remaining, your talk page. Cool Hand Luke 12:26, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Apples, Vaud

No, I wasn't talking to you. My edit comment just referred to the nonsense "Habitants: Renards", which the anon user copied over from fr:Apples. The problem with this is that I have never, ever heard anyone refer to any person from the village of Apples as a "renard" (which is French and means "fox"). At best, this could be an in-joke. And I happen to live quite near. I wonder where fr:Utilisateur:Greatpatton (User:Greatpatton) lives... BTW, your reverts are fine: Apples is a village, so there is no sense in talking about a capital. On the territory of the commune of Apples, there is exactly one incorporated settlement: the village Apples. Lupo

Universism Undeletion

Asbestos, please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_undeletion#Universist_Movement Universist 03:41, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Image_sleuthing#Image:IAEC_Indian_Point_PWR.png

Any word yet? – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 17:16, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)

Edit count

I noticed that you had a link to the old site for kate's tools on your user page. The new page is at http://kohl.wikimedia.org/~kate/cgi-bin/count_edits.cgi – AB CD 02:03, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Good bye

Asbestos-

Thank you for your rich opinions on Wikipedia. I have closed my user page and am leaving Wikipedia.

Keep your eyes on his latest round of sock puppets: OWURob, Patnaik, OWU07, et.al. I think that you'll find with me gone, they'll evaporate as well.

My best to you - and remember to keep your eye on Rananim; he is cruel and he is dangerous He is a liar who will turn on you when it no longer serves his purpose to use you has he has in these past few weeks. Stude62 14:08, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

deletion of image deletion

It was an accident I guess Rmrfstar 02:23, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Spam?

Sorry Man.... Did not know that "external links" to providers of the subject matter at hand counted as "spam" - Where are the rules of Wikipedia? Read about the site in the WSJ. BMI Gaming is the leading national provider of old video arcade games, and though we would be a good resource for those looking to purchase older games. We have be written about in the New York Times, Fortune Magazine, Wired, etc.... - User talk:65.8.14.99 10:21, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

After reading up on the guidelines of Wiki, we object to your categorization of our placing of external links in specific gaming categorys of unique and very hard to find products that we carry. Each and every catagory we have placed a link in we actually carry that title game for sale on our web site, www.bmigaming.com. BMI Gaming is the largest consumer provider of video arcade games and pinball machines in the nation, with over 500 arcade games for sale at any given time. We also host the world's largest showroom and museum of arcade games, with over 220 games set on free play in our showroom based in Boca Raton, FL. We have been written about in the New York Times, FORTUNE Magazine, Wired Magazine, The Robb Report, and countless other local and regional newspapers, in addition to national radio shows and PBS TV.

I would ask politely that you replace the hard work we tried to accomplice this evening, based on Wiki guidelines as set forth here, that we quickly found and read after receiving your messages about us "spamming" the site....

From this site:

Advertising. Articles about companies and products are fine if they are written in an objective and unbiased style and their subject is relevant enough to merit an article.

External links to commercial organisations are acceptable if they can serve to identify major corporations associated with a topic (see finishing school for an example). Please note Wikipedia does not endorse any businesses and it does not set up affiliate programs.

Please reply via email since we haveyet to setup an account here

Sincerely,

Dave [email protected] BMI Gaming - The World's Largest Gaming Superstore Boca Raton, FL 561-391-7200 / 877-FLA-PINS

Reply to your post: What we are attempting to do is PERFECTLY FINE by the guidelines on the site. We are NOT "spamming", but very selectively placing one external link in gaming categories where we are experts in the subhect matter at hand.

It would appear from your actions and the guidelines there that you are imposing your own anti-capitalist or communistic views here, which go against the written guidelines stated above taken directly from this site, and denying anyone looking for arcade game information or to buy a game the right to make their own decision. We are NOT just a "e-commerce" site peddling wiggets, but a community, with over 400 pages and over 750,000 words in our web site, with many informative articles about how to buy a machines, how to ship a machine, what to look for in a machine, machine details, pictures, production dates and amounts, game features, gameroom planning information and much more. We are the LEADING RESOURCE on the web and in our local area for people interested in considering arcade games for the home, and by that definition, we should be more than entitled to place strategic links to our site anywhere there is synergy with the subject matter at hand (arcade games) and our expertise in the subject matter. If you have a legitimate complaint, thats another matter. User:65.8.14.99 (Dave) 11:00, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcoming message

The title pretty much sums it up, doesn't it? Thanks for the message, it made me feel welcome. I hope my contributions are appreciated by the community Sarg 14:20, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hi again. Since you said I could ask you if I had problems, here I am with my first one :) I'm having a little problem with VfD. I want to nominate an article called [[Cheeses%85]] because it is a duplicate. As you can see, it has ... in its name, which is displayed with %85. The problem comes when I have to update today's [| log on VfD] with 'Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Cheeses%85'. It doesn't recognize the link. I have tried with other formatting techniques, but without much success. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Sarg 13:08, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- What a mess! Apparently Andy and you fixed it. Now it is working as needed. Thanks a lot! Sarg 15:11, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Spam?

Hi Jmabel — could I just get a quick second opinion on whether you think these contributions by User:65.8.14.99 count as spam? I've reverted them all, but have since recieved several angry messages and emails saying they ought not be counted as spam (and, oddly, calling me a Communist). If you have a moment, I'd appreciate an opinion.
Thanks! — Asbestos | Talk 10:48, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Of course. Absolutely spam, and commercial spam at that. Not even in a gray zone. -- Jmabel | Talk 15:43, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Asbestos -- I happened to come across this exchange with Dave, and I'd just like to let you know this is 100% grade A link spam, no preservatives or artificial sweeteners added. My advice to you is to ignore Dave's missives and keep on reverting his spam. Regards & happy editing, Wile E. Heresiarch 07:01, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I normally avoid using the epithet 'spam', but it seems entirely justified in this case. There is no attempt to establish relevance to the article on which the advertisement is placed. Noisy | Talk 09:31, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)

Clerk Mentality

Hi Sam..

So what exactly is your personal defination of "arbritrary links" in the context of your email comments below? Because Wiki sure does not have one, at least where I have read - Perhaps you might send me the link to it please.

Also, you point out below : "Linking the article "Joust", for instance, toan _informative_, non-commercial article on your site _might_ be within the external linking policy" (sic) -

Sam, have you ever READ Wiki's "external linking policy" or is this just more your bullshit, anti-capitalist office clerk mentality behavioral pattern intended to foster your own self-esteem? You most definitely have NO clue whatsoever as to what Wiki really is about, at least by your offering up your utterly stupid comment that "Wikipedia is about creating an encyclopedia" - Especially then Wiki SPECIFICALLY goes out of its way to state that it is NOT an encyclopedia... Or did do you miss that part in "administer" training? ( Also, for my records, what other two administrators did you "consult" with on this issue? (I saw one above from "Jmabel", who I would take does not have a clue about video arcade games, or us for that matter, or about the published Wiki policy on commercial links) - I have a friend or two here that I would like to discuss your reacent actions with before moving furthur into it.

David

user

How to change the user name? I would like to do it.

Märklin boxes

Hi

yes I do think its good information, collectors use the information as well as the print run information to try and date their Märklin equipment. I am hoping that others will add the actual date ranges to the article to improve the accuracy of dating an item.

Regarding the images, I thought that checking the box on the upload page would indicate the rights stuff - so I will go and look at that again and try to add the info. I took them all and am happy to put them into the Public Domain...

Dale

Thx for Templates Tip

Thanks for the tip on templates. I made those changes. It will save me a few seconds of OpenInNewWindow/Copy/Paste time from now on. I borrowed your anonymous user boilerplate on User:Feco/Templates. It's mirrored there, with the only change being I stuck my sig at the bottom (see User:Feco/anon). Let me know it's ok for me to use your template. Feco 19:52, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Follow-up Q on templates... I have them working fine, although I find they're prone to edits by other users. For example, I post {{User:Feco/cats}} on someone's talk page. If they click the EDIT link by that section, it launches the editor on my template. I tried sticking a __NOEDITSECTION__ on my templates, but that doesn't seem to help. Any tips? Feco 00:16, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Free iPods

the free iPods is not a scam. i know a lot fo people who have recieved theirs. i think it's a great idea that other people shoudl know about. isn't that the point of this? to spread information freely? and who doesn't like free stuff?

Six degrees of Wikipedia

No, I didn't know about Six Degrees of Wikipedia. Thanks for the link! BTW, you're the first person to respond to that item since I put it on my user page about 2 years ago. -- llywrch 16:11, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

More Thanks,at yours

Hello. i is for me one great honour and poses much pride in aid in this articles of japanese nationalism,japanese defensive politicis 1905-40 to asian mainland,strike north and south groups and south sea areas.

some historians and certain persons questioned about of why type of ideology and/or political and philosopical ideals can to move at figth at Imperial japanese forces during ww2? or how are the political and military think why theirs poses or which are your ideological and political doctrines why are use to trained at Imperial military Japanese forces?

well,i expect why my little and humble support can to present any response at respect or for less served how point of cominzed to one posterior historical analizes or discusion at respect,for compared these doctrines and ideology with other axis companions; Germany and Italy or the Allies counterparts;British,Dutch,China,USSR or USA military ,ideological and political doctrines,but in historical sense,clear.

i am having to oportunity to knowed over particular topic and decide to present historical information at respect with informative pourposes.

if one very scarcy knowed topic ,why appareing interesting in military and political history,if how i can to cover one absence of information at respect,thing why prided much.i remember why debt to continuing my personal work in karafuto economics and social aspects and general information of manchukuo(economical,social,farming,geographical,etc) why i stay incomplete still.i poses similar information of Meng Chiang State too,why liked to sended at yours.

for way i present one historic list of diverse source of additional information of general and political aspects for all interest in know more about of lifestyle,political,ideological and other aspects of Japanese Empire during 30s and 40s years times.

more thanks at yours,for permit aided for your historical sources.

Your Humble server Wladimir K. Panama (ancient username Wladk.)

change of username

I can't change my username. I wish to do this. But sign shows, that service don't work. What should I do in this situation?

I'm not sure exactly what you did. Did you go to Special:Userlogin, type in your desired username, type in your password both times, and press "Create account"? If so it should have worked. — Asbestos | Talk 12:50, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

freeipods

cmon, couldnt you leave that up for a little, its not like i was defacing the site or anything, it actually fit into the article. humorless bastard...

What fit into which article? Assuming this is about Free iPods, I merely voted to delete the site. Oh, and possibly removed your referral number — I guess that's what you mean. Tough, I guess. That's not what articles are for. — Asbestos | Talk 08:19, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

cog sci

There are only a few schools that offer that major, my school cmu being one, and I didnt think wesly did. How did you major there? Were there any job openings after that or did you have to go to grad school?

You're right, actually. Wesleyan doesn't have a cognitive science major. I had to apply and design it myself, doing what they call a "University Major." It was nice as it meant that I could pick and choose all the interesting classes out of Neurobiology, Philosophy and Psychology, without taking otherwise-required large introductory classes.

As for jobs — I didn't even look. At the time I wasn't interested in a job in cog sci, and went straight to grad school to study AI. Now, who knows? Might think about going back into a cog sci related field. We'll see, I guess. — Asbestos | Talk 08:19, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Great Wall of China hoax

I actually don't have to book, it was cited by a man who contributed this story to another book and cited this book as his reference. As far as what he took from the book I don't know. The only sentences word for word I used are the quotes by reporters. I added my own historical information and topic headings that he didn't have. I borrowed a few adverbs, but not one sentence is 'word for word'. Admittedly, it is not a standard encyclopedic type entry, I really don't know how to make it otherwise. Actually if you read it carefully, you will probably find many grammatical errors, as generally I tend to ignore grammar, and let others fix it. Also the word "incredible" one dictionary definition of this word is 'something hard to believe', so it really isn't an opinion word the way I'm using it. Feel free to correct or rewrite what doesn't make sense, although I prefer no information be deleted. LibraryLion

No problem, and thanks for your comments. I think I will write on the discussion page some specifics on the article just to clarify. LibraryLion

Ball High School

Look at the Talk:Ball High School page Texaswebscout 10:14, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for the friendly welcome

Thanks for the welcome. I'll read the links you sent to me. Ta.

Beli 10:16, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)beli

Thanks for the heads up

Apologies. I was not aware of Wikipedia's policy on pictures but will remove it ASAP. Regards, Salva 20:02, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Papal Installation and What's Possible

This will all be moot Sunday,but I still firmly disagree with your position on what is more speculative/realistic.To assume that a man given five days to undergo a ceremony can replace that ceremony and come up with a very expensive central item for the replacement ceremony--which is what the text you retain suggests-- is extremely speculative.That his cited traditionalism may manifest itself in a commitment to restore the Coronation as at least an option for future Popes,as I suggest in the text you have deleted twice,is clearly,as I state,more likely.--Louis Epstein/[email protected]/12.144.5.2 18:31, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Italian translation

Thanks for help with Italian text. -PioM _talk 19:31, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Style usage vote
I believe that your vote in Survey_on_Style-Prefixed_Honorary_Titles does not match the comments you make in explanation. The option you vote for is to prefix all known styles--including those of "any random person" (e.g. the fringe anti-Popes). Of course, it's your vote to make; but you might want to read the stated options again. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 18:02, 2005 Apr 30 (UTC)
Hey Asbestos! Thanx for your welcome note!
Thanx for that friendly welcome of yours....I promise to do my duty as a Wikipedian!!! Keep up the good work!!!
Padillo 6:57, 08 May 2005
Bootcamps
Hi Asbestos,
There hasn't been much sustained interest in the bootcamp. On a few occasions there have been gatherings there to cover specific topics, and for a while there were weekly meetings on Thursdays. What I found is that people would occasionally pop into the IRC channel during the day, but unless there was an announcement in other IRC chans, nobody would show up. The bootcamps we had were full of non-newbies who were curious (and often learned something)... maybe we need something else for the true newbs? I wonder if I should just cancel the whole thing. +sj + 20:04, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
"Vote corralling" discussion
moved from User talk:Whig
His belief iii is correct, not incorrect. He was asking people not to vote their true preferences, i.e., to prevent any option but A from winning, by voting dishonest preferences for B, C, D, in order to block Z. Votes for B, C, D will not block Z. A vote for A and only A is a vote against Z, a vote for A>B>C>D>Z is also a vote against Z, accorded no greater weight for having ranked B, C and D. His mistaken belief that the system could be gamed in this way is not the point, except insofar as it demonstrated a flaw in the Debian modification of CSSD. Asking people not to vote their true preferences is asking them to vote dishonestly, whatever his motivations may have been and however ill-founded his expectations.
And yes, I was angry, but I am not made to feel he acted in good faith simply because he was in error about the consequence. I gladly assume good faith where an advocation to dishonesty is not made. The record to the contrary speaks for itself. Whig 17:50, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I can't help but think it a little hypocritical, though, that you and Lulu appear to be discussing votes that you state are not your actual preferences, while criticizing Jtdirl for suggesting that other people do the same. Changing your vote "to try to avoid an inconclusive survey result" may be laudable, but above you note that not voting your true preferences is voting dishonestly, and it is on this categorical principle that you have attacked Jtdirl. As both sets of actions are designed to influence the survey by not voting for one's true preference, but instead by calculating the effect of a ranking on the over-all outcome, I can't help but notice a level of hypocrisy in your attacks.

FWIW, though, I've changed my votes so that 3>1: Options 1 and 2 are clearly illogical and I freely admit that I don't know what I was thinking. — Asbestos | Talk 21:04, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I would note, Asbestos, that I disagreed with Whig's suggestion that Jtdirl acted inappropriately in encouraging voters to complete their preferences. And on my User:talk page, I stated that I also felt that Whig's suggestion seemed to be for tactical voting (and I did not change my vote in accordance with Whig's recommendation). That said, I don't really think there is anything wrong with tactical voting as a matter of principle. So while Jtdirl was not wrong, neither is Whig, really. That said, my own vote now reflects my actual preference (and has all along, though I had a slight change of opinion along the way on the merits of alternatives 4 and 3; my first two preferences either way though). Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 22:20, 2005 May 12 (UTC)
copied from User talk:Whig
I'm not opposed to Alternative 3, and I prefer to compromise in favor of the "non-Alternative 1" consensus than to allow those who might swing their votes at the last minute to intentionally create a deadlock from using my vote to help them be able to do so. Call it defensive strategy if you like, but it is my honest preference, given Lulu's insightful observation above [on my Talk page]. Whig 23:05, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, if you'll note my last comment on the now-archived thread at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (biographies)/Survey on Style-Prefixed Honorary Titles/Vote Corralling in reply to Bratsche: "A compromise can be considered tactical, but it isn't dishonest." Whig 03:33, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Capoeira
Not sure how to respond to messages. I typed it up in my talk page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TomCerul#Angola
Disrupting Wikipedia vote
You voted once for the policy at Wikipedia:Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. Despite a 75% support that vote was rejected by the minority. A new vote has been called with a two week limit at Wikipedia talk:Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. Please take a moment to participate. Thanks. - Tεx τ urε 17:10, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

3RR
moved from User talk:E.A
Hi, firstly apologies for the anon edit, my PC has got a virus, have to access internet from safe mode, forgot to log in.
Thanks for your involvement, the reason i have had to relentlessy revert is because Argy edits have turned a relatively neutral article into a list of legal rulings with no analysis, insulting language to Turkish Cypriots and downright lies. He has made no compromises while i have reworded my edits to get him to stop reverting. He has discounted my sources (even though their the same as his!), he has listed a section of human right abuses by Turks, but refuses any wrongdoing was done unto Turks. I would be glad to be rid of this article, but it seems, with the exception of rather good anon edits today and Schnuder, that no one is interested in balancing and removing his insulting POV's.
I can't comment on the article at hand, knowing very little about it. What you could do, however, would be to list the article at Wikipedia:Requests for comment (under Article content disputes), and place a notice in the article's talk page saying that you have done so. This should encourage other editors who know about the situation to discuss the article and try to reach some consensus on what should and what should not be in the article.

Whatever you do, though, you should try to stop reverting the article. An admin who sees that would be liable to block you immediately, even if your version of the article is more accurate. — Asbestos | Talk 21:22, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
A very qualified user is producing an excellent and impartial article on the Cyprus conflict, user Argyrosargyrou is again filling it with hate filled drivel. Is there no way to stop him? Im not too clued up on procedures in Wikipedia. Thanks. --E.A 15:33, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]