User talk:Matthew
 |
Lost items found. Paranormal Investigations.
|
I await your further explaination at Talk:Time War (Doctor Who) or Talk:Intergalactic War (Blake's 7), rather than you making a point by going down my contribs list and reverting en masse. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 09:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Rather you should cease making your pointy (undiscussed) edits en masse, in actuality I actually have several of these pages watchlisted. Probably because I'm interested in them. Matthew 09:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- The Ultimate Force articles at least need to be rewritten into episode articles instead of battle articles, then. As for Battle of P3Y-229, it's going to be exactly the same as the other two articles, so please explain your reasoning futher there. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 09:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed, they need improving -- but I don't see that as a reason to wholesale remove content. (PS: Please note I've added a complaint at ANI/3RR regarding Battle of P3Y-229) Matthew 09:34, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- The Ultimate Force articles at least need to be rewritten into episode articles instead of battle articles, then. As for Battle of P3Y-229, it's going to be exactly the same as the other two articles, so please explain your reasoning futher there. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 09:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Hm. That was uncalled-for. Struck. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 09:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- The first edit isn't a revert.
- WP:WAF and WP:FICT both counsel merging or just redirecting that largely poorly-written, unreferenced plot summary. If you're planning to improve the articles, though, I don't have any objections. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 09:41, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
I pulled this out of the archive, since it got archived a bit too aggressively.
Currently, I'm fiddling with a new fictional battle infobox. The work is going on at User:A Man In Black/Yeah, and the discussion is going on at User talk:A Man In Black#Ideas for the fictional military conflict infobox. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 00:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Editing my talk page
OK, this message is primarily NOT regarding our conflict, so all I am going to say is that if you leave the content edits intact, I would be happy to drop it for the time being. You got one. Not that hard, was it? Since my edit summary mentioned EXACTLY what I was changing. This edit summary mentions the other changes I am concerned about.
But, like I said, that is not what I am here about. I came to ask, why the hell do you keep editing my redirected talk page instead of my main talk page which it redirects to? --2Wikid (talk) 01:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC)