User talk:Hughcharlesparker
| talk page |
|---|
| 2006 archive |
| 2007 archive |
| 2008 archive |
| 2009 archive |
| 2010 archive |
| 2011 archive |
| If you leave me a message here I'll answer it here, rather than on your talk page. This way the conversation stays together. Similarly, if I leave a message on your talk page, please reply there. |
Nikolai Bernstein
Hi. Thanks for the improvement to my note on Nikolai Bernstein. (That was my first WP contribution.) Your solution, the new section, was the way I should have done it. Appreciate your help. FLJerseyBoy 18:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that you have previously worked on Template:Civil2. I thought you should know that it is currently proposed for deletion. Please consider adding your comments at templates for deletion. -- Aylahs (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Room of Katinas
Hello, you recently reverted my edit to Seb Rochford. I realise that you would like to have the conversation on my talk page, however there has been no reply, so this is just to tell you that I stand by my edit, and would like to resolve this instead of just putting it back. Thanks, Thesamc 22:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, Thesamc. You left a note explaining your edit in the right place, the talk page of the article concerned. I replied there a couple of weeks ago. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 11:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, I forgot to check it. Thanks, Thesamc 19:21, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- :) No problem. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 19:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, I forgot to check it. Thanks, Thesamc 19:21, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Age category
Hello! If you are receiving this message, that means that your user page is in a specific year category. Per a recent user-category per deletion, all specific year categories are to be deleted. If you wish to continue using year categories, you have two options:
- Using an age group category, such as Category:Wikipedians in their 30s
- Using a decade category, such as Category:Wikipedians born in the 1970s.
If you wish, you may do both. Hopefully, this change in categorization will be quick and painless. Happy editing! --An automated message from MessedRobot 12:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Ignatzmice. I think you thought Folklore Village was an ad, which it wasn't. It's a grat place and I was going to write an article about it. Could you explain why you think it was an ad?
Sorry, Ignatzmicetalkcontribs 18:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- In my edit I removed two redlinks and an advert; Folklore Village was one of the redlinks; the advert was one of the other entries. Once the Folklore Village article is in place we can put a link back on the FV page. You might want to read wikipedia's notability criteria first, though. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 08:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Sorry! Ignatzmicetalkcontribs 13:38, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Dr. Who / Happy Numbers
FYI: I've moved our entire conversation to the talk page of happy number so others might join in! - DavidWBrooks 21:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Elbow, elbow-joint, etc.
Just so you know, the elbow page has been moved to elbow (disambiguation) and elbow joint has been moved to elbow, per your request. If you want, take a look so that everything looks OK. Thanks for mentioning this! For more information, you could also look at Talk:Elbow (disambiguation) Cheers! If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 06:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Brain Gym
This is probably on your watchlist, but it appears that the Brain Gym folks have removed everything they don't like again. I haven't reverted it on the chance that they've added something useful, but it's a bit hearts-and-flowers now. Acroterion (talk) 20:03, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- It is on my watchlist, but thanks for the note anyway. I checked the diff - the only changes were the removal of a few words in a way that subtracted meaning, and the removal of five paragraphs of concise well-cited criticism. I've revered it back. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 09:56, 12 July 2007 (UTC)