Jump to content

Talk:Naruto: Clash of Ninja

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 76.108.235.13 (talk) at 18:49, 18 July 2007 (→Things to do...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconVideo games Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Change it back

Please! Someone changed it! It has almost no ino about each game. Characters, stages, all gone. I cant change it! I dont know how!

STAGES! NOW!

they are doing things one step at a time so calm down and be patient Kyuubi29 14:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dont care, everything was better before, now it was changed for no reason! Bring it back to the way things were! And seperate pre time skip characters from post time skip on the table of characters. NOW!

There was a reason. You just failed to notice the discussion. // DecaimientoPoético 02:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sound Four and Kimmimaro

if tayuya is playable the other sound four might be playable i dont know about kimmimaro. Kyuubi29 14:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deidara and Sasori wont be in Revolution

They definitely are not going to be in Naruto: Clash of Ninja Revolution. The anime is nowhere near this arc (or series, they are from Shippuden).

That isn't proof. You need to find an actual source saying they won't be in the game. ~SnapperTo 19:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I Agree. Change it back.

This is a bad idea. These games, dispite being sequels to each other, all deserve their own page. There is now no room for boxart, stages, and now information is gonna have to be squeezed in just to make it fit. The character box is a pain to go through when all you wanna find out is which character in in ___________ game. If you're doing this you might as well combine all the Sonic Advance games into one, all the Pokémon games into one, and all the Dragon Ball Z games into one :/ 76.108.235.13 02:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Read, and move on. This is the format that's been decided to stay. // DecaimientoPoético 01:47, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I did read it, and ironiclly not many people agree with you :/ 76.108.235.13 02:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Box art and stage lists are not enough of a precedent to get the separate pages back. // DecaimientoPoético 17:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There are more reasons. Let's see...the character box is a pain to get through, you have limited information on the games themselves, people can't tell which game Demon Fox Naruto is in, or which game Cursemark Sasuke is in, etc. And trust me, that's only the begining of my list 76.108.235.13 02:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see your point with the Kyubi Naruto/CS Sasuke/etc. issue, but that can be easily fixed. Also, we're still in the early stages of merging these articles. Once the series pages are completed, we're going to focus more on adding reception, gameplay elements, and development of each series as a whole. If you wish to at least try to get things back to the way they were, you might want to come up with arguments better than "we have no box art!" or "it was better the other way i liked it as separate pages change it back!" since these seem to be the only comments we're getting. // DecaimientoPoético 02:27, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alright then. Release dates, receptions of all 5 games (well, maybe 2 if you exclude 3, 4, and Ex) and more information on the games as individuals, not as a whole. Another thing, all I want is info on Revo., not the series, and there are very few external links on Revolution. Since this page is in early stages of devlopment, I'll tolerate this for now. But I do hope you plan on re-organizing this a lot more 76.108.235.13 02:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We are not here to cater to your needs. If you want that information in the article you are perfectly capable of adding it yourself. ~SnapperTo 02:43, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Who said I wasn't gonna help? 76.108.235.13 02:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your comment suggested you'd like someone else to do it instead. In any event, you can look to the old articles for information you'd like to transfer here, links to which are given below.
As you might notice, there is little information that is of any importance that has not been transferred here. Nevertheless, I'm sure there is something someone would like to see salvaged. Happy searching. ~SnapperTo 06:21, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alright then. Thank you 76.108.235.13 02:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the others, CHANGE IT BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It was way better when each game had its article

It was not better when each game had its own article. We're merging the articles to refrain from having stubs with nothing but character and stage lists. Also, we're still in the early stages of the merging, so just give us some time. // DecaimientoPoético 17:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Im the guy from, CHANGE IT BACK!!

cant we have a vote or something

if they say give them more time then give them more time. and deal with it because the are not changing it back. Kyuubi29 16:26, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is evil. Besides, we already had a discussion on this matter, ending in favour of series articles. // DecaimientoPoético 22:55, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who exactly includes "we"?

Please, the people are speaking. Get off your high ass and bring us what we want. Not just this series, but the ones on DS, PS2, and more. I want to see what characters will be in naruto path of a ninja. Now I cant. I want to see box arts, release dates, reception of the game, stages, and more. I want to see more info. This merger is crap and you need to change it. Nobody likes it. At all.

stop complaining. just give them more time. they are trying to add that stuff. just calm down. and please sign your posts.Kyuubi29 12:33, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is ridiculous. You (the IP) are telling me you're blindly arguing over this merge without even bothering to check and see if we had any kind of discussion on the matter?
Read the discussion, and if you have more problems, please bring it there. This way, we can refrain from having the same discussion over and over again on every single series page. // DecaimientoPoético 16:38, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I found out about it after it ended. Look, you messed up. Stop being a baby and fix your mistake.

Ok, lets change it back

I don't have to listen to your complaints anymore. We had a discussion, it ended in favour of series articles, there's nothing more to it. The series articles contain the same exact info as the separate ones, drop the box art and stage lists. I suggest you stop beating a dead horse and just live with it. Or why not be bold and do something about it besides complain? Nothing's stopping you. // DecaimientoPoético 18:33, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need some help...

Nevermind, someone helped me. Thanks to whoever it is! 76.108.235.13 02:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gamecube Stages Added

I finally added the Gamecube stages, but does anyone here know the Ex stages? 76.108.235.13 04:04, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the stages section as they are little more than different-looking backdrops. If they were a bit more interesting they might be worth of mentioning, though even then a simple mention under each game stating how they are interesting would be better suited. ~SnapperTo 04:18, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously? I was working on that thing for hours...Fine 76.108.235.13 04:19, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, you reply really quickly. Anyway, most fighting games don't list stages (and some, I've noticed, don't even list characters). Sorry for the inconvenience. ~SnapperTo 04:22, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, there's nothing better to do :p That's ok 76.108.235.13 04:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Things to do...

Now that we've made a step in the right direction (receives hate from all the anons above) by condensing the game articles, we can move forward. I'm torn between whether general reception and gameplay deserve entire sections of their own, noting changes throughout the games, or we can use the present sections and note changes in gameplay, development, and reception for each under their specific title. Perhaps a "general gameplay" section noting aspects present in all (or most at least) games would be appropiate. Discuss. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 06:59, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I like the general gameplay section idea. A general reception I'm not so sure about though, because you really can't compare a mediocre game like Clash of Ninja (my opinion) with one like Gekitou Ninja Taisen 4 76.108.235.13 18:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Naruto:_Clash_of_Ninja&oldid=145488525"