User talk:Shutterbug/Archive/Archive-Oct2007
The above arbitration case has recently concluded. COFS (now Shutterbug) is asked to refrain from recruiting editors whose editing interests are limited to Scientology-related topics. Anynobody is prohibited from harassing Justanother, and Justanother is urged to avoid interesting himself in Anynobody's actions. All Scientology-related articles are placed on article probation. For the Arbitration Committee, Cbrown1023 talk 03:13, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hi. As you may know, there was a proposal made that you be banned from editing Wikipedia for 30 days as a result of allegedly problematic editing, which had been accepted at one point by a majority of the arbitrators. (I am not an arbitrator myself, so I didn't vote, or investigate whether the allegations had merit or not.) As the case dragged on longer and longer, I made the point on the talkpage that the remedy proposal had become stale, in that banning you for October based on edits you did in May would not be appropriate. Enough arbitrators agreed with me that the proposed ban wound up not being adopted, but I thought you ought to know that it was being considered. I assume you know all this, but just wanted to make sure. I hope that in the future your editing will conform with all our policies so that no further issues will arise. Regards, Newyorkbrad 20:01, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you for the note. No, I was no aware of the outcome of the discussion. Thanks for pointing out the 30-day ban irregularity. I'll try to stick to the rules as much as possible but would wish that those are enforced on everybody, also those whose only contribution to WP is provoking others. Shutterbug 17:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Anynobody has been warned thoroughly, and we're watching others. Please hold yourself to the highest standards. If you are provoked, keep your cool. You can see how I handled such a situation myself. Look at WP:ANI#Ongoing Harassment by Matt57. - Jehochman Talk 18:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- "We", who's that? Jehochman, as long as individuals like F451 or like.liberation are not remotely touched by Admins it is really hard to believe any assurances or that "article probation" is more than a tag on the talk page. Shutterbug 18:10, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- I've been watching a variety of people, as have other people involved in the case. If you see problems, file a nice calm report, or ask me for help. - Jehochman Talk 18:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- "We", who's that? Jehochman, as long as individuals like F451 or like.liberation are not remotely touched by Admins it is really hard to believe any assurances or that "article probation" is more than a tag on the talk page. Shutterbug 18:10, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Anynobody has been warned thoroughly, and we're watching others. Please hold yourself to the highest standards. If you are provoked, keep your cool. You can see how I handled such a situation myself. Look at WP:ANI#Ongoing Harassment by Matt57. - Jehochman Talk 18:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you for the note. No, I was no aware of the outcome of the discussion. Thanks for pointing out the 30-day ban irregularity. I'll try to stick to the rules as much as possible but would wish that those are enforced on everybody, also those whose only contribution to WP is provoking others. Shutterbug 17:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC)