User:Pharaoh of the Wizards/Pharaoh of the Wizards/new/Archive

Talk Archive
Archive

Thanks for the welcome and encouragement. The learning curve is rather steep! Tudorking 19:38, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

Dear Pharaoh of the Wizards/Pharaoh of the Wizards/new, ______ __ __ __ /\__ _\/\ \ /\ \ /\ \ \/_/\ \/\ \ \___ __ ___\ \ \/'\ __ __ ___ __ __\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ `\ /'__`\ /' _ `\ \ , < /\ \/\ \ / __`\/\ \/\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \/\ \_\.\_/\ \/\ \ \ \\`\\ \ \_\ \/\ \_\ \ \ \_\ \\ \_\ \ \_\ \ \_\ \_\ \__/.\_\ \_\ \_\ \_\ \_\/`____ \ \____/\ \____/ \/\_\ \/_/ \/_/\/_/\/__/\/_/\/_/\/_/\/_/\/_/`/___/> \/___/ \/___/ \/_/ /\___/ \/__/ For your contribution to My RfA, which passed with 8000 Supports, 2 Neutrals and no opposes. The standards and dedication of the English Wikipeidan Administrators is excellent and I am privileged to stand among them. Thankyou for putting you trust in me, I'll not see it abused. And now, I will dance naked around a fire. Party at my place! Cheers! Dfrg.msc 08:59, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

Thanks, Archive! Thank you for your support in my RfA. It was a success, and I look forward to getting started! Hiberniantears 18:04, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

npov?

So, can I ask if you, yourself thought the article failed to comply with NPOV?

Theanks Geo Swan 05:18, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

perceived POV?

I write on controversial topics, so I make a special effort to fully comply with WP:NPOV and the other core wikipolicies.

I don't exect to succeed 100% of the time. So I ask everyone who has expressed a concern about my contributions have lapsed from policy whether they will offer me a specific explanation of how specific passages have lapsed from policy.

Sometimes other wikipedians can't be bothered explaining their concern.

Sometimes other wikipedians do respond, and I become a better wikipedia contributor, because they were right.

Sometimes those other wikipedian do respond, and, from their responses I come to the conclusion their concern was triggered by a misunderstanding. I want to avoid contributing material that triggers a valid POV concern. And I want to avoid contributing material that falsely triggers a perception of POV.

I'd really appreciate it if you could take the time to be specific about what triggered your concerns.

Cheers! Geo Swan 18:22, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, Um-tut-Sut!

Some folks just don't seem to get it, do they? --Orange Mike 18:21, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

RfA thank-spam

Thank you! Thank you for your help in my RfA. It hammered home a few things I need to keep in mind while admining and passed with a final tally of 40/0/4; two people forgot to vote in time, leaving me short of that exquisite number :-(, but I'll just have to fudge the next vote about me. Adminship feels slightly august but not particularily exalted, so I shall endeavour to consider it a toolkit and make sincere efforts to know what I'm doing before using it. If you later on have something to say or want to ask for -- MESSAGE EATEN BY BEARS --Kizor 13:50, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia has a second Carlos admin

Click there to open your card! → → →

My dear Wikipedian Pharaoh of the Wizards/Pharaoh of the Wizards/new,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 29 supports, 1 opposed, and 3 neutral. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, or even if you just stopped by to make a comment, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. Since I am a new admin, if you have any suggestions or concerns, feel free to inform me of them. Special thanks to Carlossuarez46 for encourage me and nomination. Thank you and good day.

Carlosguitar

Credits

This RFA thanks was inspired by The Random Editor, who in turn was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. So unfortunately this is not entirely my own design.

This end the usual RFA thanks spam. You may return to your regular editing now.

Sri Lanka issues

Please see: Discussion move and Specific proposal Your participation and acceptance would be appreciated. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi there; just a friendly reminder that we really need your input on the proposal being discussed here. Without it, we can't craft a solution which is acceptable to everyone, and without indicating your willingness to go along with a solution, the whole process could fail. Thanks in advance, --Haemo 19:31, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Have you thought about it ? :)))Taprobanus 17:13, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Successful RfA - Thank you!

Thank you for supporting my recent RfA. It was successful, and I was promoted to Administrator today. I appreciate the support! — KieferSkunk (talk) — 23:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

AIV reports

Could you please leave some sort of description when you report people to AIV? It's kind of nice to see some sort of summary in a report. Thanks! EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:41, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

My (KWSN's) RFA

Thank you for supporting my recent (and successful!) RfA. It passed at at 55/17/6. Kwsn (Ni!) 01:16, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you :-)

		My RFA
		Thanks for your support in my recent request for adminship, which was successful. I'll do my best to justify the confidence you've placed in me! Dppowell 23:16, 31 October 2007 (UTC) My recent RfA Thank you for participating in my recent RfA. Although the voting ended at 36/22/5, there was no consensus to promote, and the RfA was unsuccessful. I would like the thank you nonetheless for supporting me during the RfA, and hope that any future RfA’s proceed better than this one did. Again, I thank you for your support. ≈ The Haunted Angel Review Me! 02:18, 3 November 2007 (UTC) Thanks for your support Thanks for your support with respect to my request for adminship, which successfully closed today with a count of 47 support, 1 oppose. If you ever see me doing anything that makes you less than pleased that you supported my request, I hope to hear about it from you. See you around Wikipedia! Accounting4Taste 05:22, 3 November 2007 (UTC) Thanks! My RFA Thanks for participating in my request for adminship, which ended with 56 supports, one oppose, and one neutral. I hope to accomplish beyond what is expected of me and work to help those that lent me their trust. east.718 at 02:33, 11/4/2007

Wikipedia has a new administrator!

Thanks! Thank you for voicing your opinion in my RfA, which passed with 54 supports, 2 opposes and 3 neutrals. Thanks for your support, I really appreciate it. I hope to exceed expectations, If you have any advice please feel free to let me know. Thanks again!. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤

Thank you bunches!

Thank you so much for suppporting my RfA. I was promoted with a total of (44/1/0) - a vote of confidence from the community that I find humbling and motivating. I will not abuse your trust. Look forward to working with you! (Esprit15d 21:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC))

Thank you for your support.

Remember, remember, the fifth of November? Thank you to everyone who participated in my Request for adminship, which was successful at 50/5/0 on November 5th, 2007. It became, as you may know, rather contentious toward the end (though fortunately no gunpowder was involved), and I appreciate the work of other Wikipedians to keep it focused. --Thespian 02:13, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Some thankyou spam, glorious spam

Thankyou for supporting my successful rfa which closed with 58 supports. If i am honest i am rather humbled by the unanimous support and i hope to live up to everyones expectations. If you ever need any help, don't hesitate to ask. Thanks again. Woodym555 15:47, 9 November 2007 (UTC)