User talk:Parent5446/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Your edit to Talk: Avatar: The Last Airbender.

Please do not arbitrarily remove or edit templates about an article's Good Article status. There is a review process wherein you can request its delisting if you feel it no longer qualifies, but removing the template will not remove the article from the list.--Fyre2387 ^{(talk • contribs)} 05:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Membership in Avatar project

Sorry for adding my name out of step. However, it's generally stated that only members of the project can assess articles, and, as I assessed one or two, I wanted to be sure I was a member before I did so. My apologies if it was perceived incorrectly or presumptuous on my part. Badbilltucker 22:01, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:AangAvatarState.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:AangAvatarState.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MECU≈talk 01:37, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:AvatarShowIntro.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:AvatarShowIntro.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Notability of The Corrao Q

A tag has been placed on The Corrao Q requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD 18:04, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

GA Nom of Avatar:The Last airbender

If an article is already a featured article, it can't be listed as a Good Article. The Placebo Effect 21:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Are you nominating Aang or Avatar: The Last Airbender. Because the forme you added the GAN template to, while the other is already a FA which is higher than a GA. The Placebo Effect 21:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

GA review of Pi

You have promoted Pi to GA class without notifying me or discussing it with me. I must note that this is a violation of WP guidelines. I urge you to refrain from these kind of actions. Regards, Daimanta 13:07, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Small Mercies

Could you please add some specific requests to the talk page - in my eyes the prose is fine, so I see it as a GA... Dihydrogen Monoxide 08:27, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

GA Sweeps

I'm sorry to inform you that participation in GA Sweeps is only available by invitation only. Only experienced reviewers who are established (trusted) within the project should participate in this initial sweep because the point is to target articles that have "fallen through the cracks", so we can't have any fall through the cracks during this. As I read through your talk page, I found that you haven't firmly understand the GA criteria. I would like to ask you to read through it before doing GA assessment. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 21:02, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

You don't have to remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. Project quality task force is open to everyone while sweeps are open to invited individuals. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 22:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Aang/Archive Topics

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Aang/Archive Topics, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. -- pb30<talk> 18:16, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Template:Archive box collapsible

I just noticed your addition of an Indexerbot subpage parameter to the template. After trying to tweak and clarify the instructions you had provided in the manual (with particular focus on usability for new and less tech-savvy users), it finally occurred to me that this parameter is really rather pointless. Anyone who wants to include a link to an Indexerbot subpage (or in fact any other link) can easily do so manually, which is less confusing and requires no further explanation. Please don't take this personally, your efforts of contributing to the template are commendable. However, I removed the parameter. |dorftrottel |talk 19:23, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Parent5446. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that: you have less than 250 mainspace edits. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 16:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

shut up

you basicly destoryed the entire aang page dude... who the fuck cares about some of the regulations, we dotn always follow some of them, because it woudl make the article bland. You condensed the netuire history of the show after the first epsiode into a small paragraph, wtf does that tell us about what he does? \& relationships, wtf, you removed importnat sections of the article... stop editing things that took us a long time to make.--Cody6 (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

new?

HOW AM I FUCKING NEW.

look at my contribs idiot, i'm far from new. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cody6 (talk • contribs) 03:50, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello Re: Aang

I must sincerely dispute your reversion of my edit to Aang As I said in the historical comment, the general description is not served well by overspecifity. The general description shouldn't be heavy on detail in the first place. Aang's flight from the temple is an exposition dump regarding his personal trauma better confined to his history, as Zuko's Agni Kai would be in his.

All the general description needs to reveal is that he is the last. His histroy can elaborate. And we really shouldn't open the door to a laundry list of Aang's notable companions in his intro. Toph, Appa and Momo would be worth a mention too, but they'd weigh it down. Please consider saving mention of his companions for the main body of the article.

This page has multiple reiterations of information, rendering portions redundant and plagued by trivia. Some of it really needs to be culled and kept on episode specific pages or confined to one mention in an appropriate subsection instead of retyped multiple times. Ideally, I'd like to see a much less bloated article. Buinne 21:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter for December 2007

The December 2007 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. Comments are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the January 2008 issue. Dr. Cash 01:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

RE:Editing Help

For a good example on what a fictional character's biography should look like, please see Padmé Amidala. It is a FA about a fictional character should be the skeleton about which you base your article. Second, you should mention it again in a new section on the talk page so people have a fresh reminder. If that doesn't work, take your last copy that you like and just start editing it. PS, mind if I adopt you? The Placebo Effect 17:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

What other people have done is worked on the article in their userspace and just copied and pasted it onto the main article when done so as to avoid having people change it while they are still working on it. The Placebo Effect 17:33, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

FYI, my AIM = Cnriaczoy3, Skype = placebo_wiki --The Placebo Effect 17:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

MInd if I steal some of your talk page and user page stuff? The Placebo Effect 21:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

No problem. Just keep in mind I took this from somebody else who had another person design it for them. They won't mind though. Parent5446^{(Murder me for my actions)} 17:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Aang Background.

I see that you and I do most of the Aang background info. Do you believe that it is speculation that Aang was born immediately after the death of Ruko.

You can respond to [email protected]

Thanks and FLAMEO

A —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.224.215.1 (talk) 14:26, 14 December 2007 (UTC)