User talk:Hamilton365
A tag has been placed on List of capital cities by importance, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dougie WII 13:36, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
You're welcome
Like I say, don't let this stop you from writing. I've been at this only since about May, and I got booed off the stage for what I thought was a pretty original concept for an article (it was about the prevalence of the phrase "Let's get out of here" in 3 out of every 4 films). Looking back on it, the article had its problems, but it didn't merit mean comments like "Oh dear God!" and the like. Once I realized that the jerks who were making the nasty comments weren't entitled to any greater treatment on Wikipedia than I, I started jumping in on the Articles for Deletion forum every day. Sad to say, however, I sometimes end up being just as much of a jerk. Anyway, thanks for accepting my apology, and don't let the boo-birds get to you. Mandsford 23:17, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Flags
Hi, and thanks for your contributions. However, using flag icons like this in infoboxes is deprecated as it is believed that our readers prefer reading items like nationality over seeing a little icon. The danger is that it can oversimplify nationality, be distracting, and can lead to sterile edit wars. See also WP:MOSFLAG. Garion96 (talk) 18:44, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Rosy Byrne
The article Rosy Byrne has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tikiwont (talk) 13:16, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Rosy Byrne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tikiwont (talk) 14:43, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Rosy Byrne, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mbisanz (talk) 20:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Flags
Hello. Could I just repeat what has been said above regarding flags. In addition, when editing infoboxes there is no need to link the spouses, as they are normally not notable and will never need an article. Links also don't need to be created for fictional characters. The opening line should not have the the place of birth/death in brackets. For UK people you should also use "df=yes" for birth/death date if using templates. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies). Thanks. --UpDown (talk) 18:25, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
- Please read this again. You have ignored some of it on Penelope Keith.--UpDown (talk) 18:42, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- If you wish to continue on Wikipedia can I please advise you take note of the above. You are continuing to add place of birth to opening bracket, contrary to MoS. And for your information, Penelope Keith is not a comedian, she is an actress who has appeared in comedy programmes. She is also not a presenter, nor to my knowledge is June Brown and other people you claim are. In addition, when linking actress please link like this "actor|actress", to avoid a redirect. The phrase "award winning" should also be avoided. It's POV and unnecessary, and very misleading. --UpDown (talk) 18:46, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- This will be my final warning before asking for further action. You are continuing to ignore MoS guidelines, and also continue to add "best known" for many people, when in fact they are not "best known" for what you claim. Please stop these edits and read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies).--UpDown (talk) 13:56, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- If you wish to continue on Wikipedia can I please advise you take note of the above. You are continuing to add place of birth to opening bracket, contrary to MoS. And for your information, Penelope Keith is not a comedian, she is an actress who has appeared in comedy programmes. She is also not a presenter, nor to my knowledge is June Brown and other people you claim are. In addition, when linking actress please link like this "actor|actress", to avoid a redirect. The phrase "award winning" should also be avoided. It's POV and unnecessary, and very misleading. --UpDown (talk) 18:46, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
December 2007
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Hilary Duff. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 17:23, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Chute (disambiguation), you will be blocked from editing. --Yamla (talk) 17:30, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
"best known for"
Please be aware that adding "best known for playing <character>" is applicable to only a small fraction of actor/actress articles. While in some cases an actor with a long career will come to be associated with particular roles (a debate raged at the Harrison Ford article for a long time over his "best known" roles), usually on Wikipedia "best known for" translates as "this is all I have seen him/her playing". Brad (talk) 22:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Infobox
Thanks for your comment. The infobox for Cranford is good, but I've made a few changes [1], notably taking the flag out. I would like to add the main cast to the infobox, but it would make it very long, so I'm leaving it empty at the moment.--UpDown (talk) 17:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
January 2008
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Meerkat Manor worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Your changes to the Meerkat Manor infobox have been reverted. The changes were highly inappropriate as they contained incorrect information, removed verified information and removed the show logo. Collectonian (talk) 17:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Za majikku awâ
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Za majikku awâ, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Za majikku awâ. RichardΩ612 19:16, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Hiya - re the new article you created about this short film, there seems to be more detail on it in Louis Le Prince#Leeds Bridge (LPCCP Type-1 MkII) - would you consider changing your new page into a redirect to that article instead - unless, of course, you know where more information can be found... ? CultureDrone (talk) 23:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Ok - thanks. I've changed the article. CultureDrone (talk) 17:27, 4 January 2008 (UTC)