Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/mr kc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Malinaccier (talk | contribs) at 22:10, 4 January 2008 (Discussion: reccomend withdrawl). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Voice your opinion (talk page) (1/4/0); Scheduled to end 18:22, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

mr kc (talk · contribs) - Mr_KC (talk) 18:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

--Mr_KC (talk) 18:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
A: I hope to be a big part this year... I have school so it will help me expand my knowlegde
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: I realy dont have any right now, but I intend to contribute alot this year. but my best would be http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posadas
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: Yes, there was someone on the same server and I got banned along with him... but i contacted an admin and got it fixed

General comments

RfAs for this user:

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/mr_kc before commenting.

Discussion

Reccomend withdrawal. Malinaccier (talk) 22:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support
  1. Support--♥♦¢åŗđş♣♠ (talk) 19:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Moral support Not sure what benefit there is to very strongly opposing someone who doesn't really know how RFA works yet, and who is just offering to help. Thank you, mr kc, for offering. In a few months, hope to see you back here. --barneca (talk) 22:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
  1. Strong Oppose - Bad answers to all three questions. You need a lot more experience so that you can get trusted as a good admin. This is likely to be snowed. D.M.N. (talk) 21:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose. Sorry, you're just not ready, as exemplified by your answers. J-ſtanContribsUser page 21:27, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Very Strong Oppose I'm sorry but your really not ready yet, you seem to have no experience in admin related fields at all, as your answers to the questions show. Harland1 (t/c) 21:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose - per the above concerns. Make sure to get a pre-determinate experience before listing here. Good luck with the next one though. Rt. 21:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose - answers and record do not reflect understanding of Wikipedia or need for administrative tools. The answer to number 2 just completely blew it. --Qmwne235 22:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. Neutral. You haven't been contributing long enough for us to trust you with the tools. Come back in a few months when you get some experience. Malinaccier (talk) 22:09, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]