Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opa!

Opa!

Delete: We may as well have a page dedicated to 'Oh!' or something. In either case, useless. x42bn6 09:54, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to wiktionary. bogdan | ^Talk 10:04, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A lot more could be written about this expression, which is famous here. Since Eh has an article, Opa! should, too. The title must change, however, because we have two ways to use/pronounce it. "Opa" can also mean "hey you made a mistake" or "I am happy" depending on how you pronounce it and how long you pronounce the O sound. "opa-opa" is also related, and I think it's used in songs. If you delete it, could someone please contribute it to my wiki? Www.wikinerds.org 10:06, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. / Peter ^Isotalo 10:15, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- As I said, this article can become encyclopedic.
  - We're not voting the potential in here. Right now it's a dictionary definition and as such it does not belong here. bogdan | ^Talk 11:35, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- If Wikipedia is not dictionary, it shouldn't have Eh, either. What I see here is double standards: What pity is it that eh, which is about the English-speaking world, is kept, while Opa!, which is about Greeks, is deleted! Www.wikinerds.org 11:11, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well... It's because of the international conspiracy against the Greeks. :-) bogdan | ^Talk 11:35, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    - I copied the article to my wiki under the GFDL. Www.wikinerds.org 11:50, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, has encyclopedic potential.Kappa 12:18, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or transwiki, per Peter, bogdan. I don't see encyclopedic potential at all. Dottore So 16:09, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]