User talk:ErgoSum88

Thanks for the welcome

=0)

- Peach (talk) 05:33, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto! Garonyldas (talk) 20:38, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New-Ish

I've been hanging around for a while, making very minor edits (often involving apostrophes) but only recently created a profile. Yes, I have a lovely male crowntail - do you have any? Thanks, I tried to keep it neutral but also, I hope, to improve the lot of a wonderful and often-mistreated creature. I do wish people would do a bit more research before buying pets.

- Peach (talk) 06:36, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Many thanks, ErgoSum88, for your words of welcome. Your labors in the realm of Federal Bridge Gross Weight Formula, one of contemporary life's underpinnings the existence of which I was hitherto completely unaware, are to me, an ordinary road-user, technically awesome; indeed mind-boggling. I likely will need technical help sooner rather than later. So who better to turn to! Thank you again for your kind offerWingspeed (talk) 12:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

This: you are not a member of this project, please do not interfere with our actions, thanks is unacceptable. Non-members of projects can edit main page (as well as talk pages) of projects. The project isn't reserved for members only to edit. Members don't own the project, see: Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. While it's directly not about the project, it states ownership policy fine for this situation. RobJ1981 (talk) 20:26, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your actions are unacceptable. Removing the link to an article that you have nominated for deletion is a clear-cut case of conflict of interest. This:removed user subpage. Leave it be Le Grand... stop trying to get people to vote there, due to you posting there has no bearing on whether or not the link belongs on the T&PC project page. He has every right to inform members of this project about articles facing deletion. Furthermore, he is not telling anyone how to vote. You don't own the article either, so why are you trying to conform it to your POV? You and I can sit here and quote policy all day long, but that doesn't change the fact that you are trying to keep members of this project from voting on this article that you nominated for deletion. If the article is not notable, it will not stand on its own, no matter how many project members vote for keeping it. Just let it be. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 20:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFC discussion of User:RobJ1981

A request for comments has been filed concerning the conduct of RobJ1981 (talk · contribs). You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/RobJ1981Template:Highrfc-loop]]. -- McJeff (talk) 06:15, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Although I've fixed it now, please ensure you do not remove the outside view template in Rfcs when commenting. Thanks. Ncmvocalist (talk) 14:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry. It was my first time participating in RfC, I didn't know. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 18:43, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok. Please note, as you have been involved with one of the parties in the past, I have adjusted the heading as it is not an outside view as such. Ncmvocalist (talk) 19:17, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good Luck

Thanks. And good luck on your GA's and FA's. I-70 in UT is finally in FA nomination. So far the beatings haven't been too severe =-). I noticed you got drug into an RfC. Ouch, those never seem to go well, I hope things work out. Davemeistermoab (talk)

Re: Kolkata facts

Yep. I have tried to to clarify stuff a bit. The data was for two different years - 2006 and 2007. I have also added a projection for 2015. Check out. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 02:21, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops

Oops, my removal of the navbox on incest was accidental. Thanks for the replacement. WLU (talk) 18:04, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thats ok, I assumed it was an accident. No harm done. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 04:48, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I-70 in UT

Interstate 70 in Utah just barely passed the FA process. Thanks for your help in donating pictures and creating some of the red-link articles to help make that happen.Dave (talk) 02:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good work, I gave you a barnstar. BTW, I dunno if you were confused or what, but the talkback template is used by the person who leaves the message. You don't have to put it on your page, I put it on your talk page when I leave you a message on my talk page. Sounds kinda complicated, I know, but thats the price to be paid for keeping a conversation contiguous. What are you working on next? --ErgoSum88 (talk) 06:09, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I appreciate it. I don't know what I'll do next. Right now I'm in some scuttles with some fellow editors, Hopefully it will stay civil.Dave (talk) 06:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Rollback

Hiya. I've granted your request for rollback. Please remember to use it only for clear cut vandalism. Pedro : Chat 10:30, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sweetness. Thank you, I will use it wisely! --ErgoSum88 (talk) 10:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,

Don't know if you noticed. Interstate 70 in Colorado just passed GA. Thanks for all the cool pics. Did you notice one of your pics is the featured pic on the P:USRD U.S. Roads portal? You're getting famous =-)Dave (talk) 00:43, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is awesome! It's a nice photo but I'm surprised they featured it because you can clearly see my mirror at the bottom! I could've easily cropped that out. lol, Well thats cool. I put Hours of service up for FA and so far so good, the only beef so far is with a few of my questionable sources. Keep up the good work. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 06:49, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moncton

Thanks for all the help with the Moncton article! It seems to be my pet project, however the majority of the writing of the article was done by others before me...if you look up the history of the article there have been about 22,000 edits to it since 2001...only about 430 by myself. However within the past year its been mostly me...last summer I worked for about two months solid to get the article to GA status however I had another editor helping me then...I figured this summer Id go for FA, see if I could do it. I greatly appriciate your help with the article, copyediting is not really my strong-suit haha. I agree about the captions, and I will think up something for the city hall one...something including the fact that its the 3rd city hall for moncton, and it was built in 1996 most likely. Ill see what I can do for references in the captions aswell. Thanks again! and happy editing!! :D Stu pendousmat (talk) 20:11, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]