Jump to content

User talk:203.53.8.10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Frank (talk | contribs) at 02:26, 13 May 2008 (Warning: Vandalism on History of Greece. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

August 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to South Australia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. .Blnguyen | rant-line 05:01, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. .Blnguyen | rant-line 05:04, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.--Arktos talk 02:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nov 2006

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Sexually transmitted disease. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. I c e d K o l a (Contributions) 04:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Feb 2007

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Paul Cyr 04:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apr 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dead Poets Society, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Netkinetic(t/c/@) 04:32, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Your recent edit to Fudge (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 23:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Your edits are unconstructive and they have been reverted. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Fudge, you will be blocked from editing. Andrew_pmk | Talk 23:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to HTTP cookie, you will be blocked from editing. Erik Warmelink 22:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your recent edit to Witness (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 02:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning for editing Levi (diff). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // MartinBot 02:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits to Less Than Jake

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 203.53.8.10! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule photobucket\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 02:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Peter Weir. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Wombatcat 02:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Blocked - June 2007

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Merope 02:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ecology, you will be blocked from editing. †Sir James Paul† 01:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ecology, you will be blocked from editing. Andrew_pmk | Talk 01:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 01:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 01:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Monopoly (game), you will be blocked from editing. Ravanacker | Talk 01:40, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Anas talk? 01:44, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. When the block expires you are free to continue editing if you intend to make useful contributions. However, if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, this account will be subject to a longer block and action could be taken against the individual behind this IP address. bibliomaniac15 BUY NOW! 04:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 1900s in fashion. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Andrew_pmk | Talk 03:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Just for Laughs, you will be blocked from editing. KJS77 03:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Montserrat, you will be blocked from editing. Spartan-James 00:40, 13 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edit to Montserrat (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. For future editing tests use the sandbox. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 00:43, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Montserrat, you will be blocked from editing. —Travistalk 00:48, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Introduced species, you will be blocked from editing. Brianga 02:53, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Domesday Book, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Vivio TestarossaTalk Who 02:01, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Scotch Oakburn College has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. InvisibleDiplomat666 03:34, 17 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to The Silver Sword has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Dadude3320 23:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

The recent edit you made to The Silver Sword constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Dadude3320 23:13, 19 March 2008 (UTC)) [reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Final Destination books. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Dadude3320 23:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

April 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Brand, you will be blocked from editing. Tcncv (talk) 23:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to One-child policy, you will be blocked from editing. Toddst1 (talk) 02:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tiptoety talk 04:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to History of Greece, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: History of Greece was changed by 203.53.8.10 (u) (t) deleting 50309 characters on 2008-05-12T00:57:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:57, 12 May 2008 (UTC) [reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to History of Greece. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: History of Greece was changed by 203.53.8.10 (u) (t) deleting 50309 characters on 2008-05-13T02:21:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to History of Greece. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Frank  |  talk  02:26, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.