User talk:RockGypsy

Regarding edits to Quantum Leap (TV series)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, RockGypsy! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bangelfire\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 15:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits to Quantum Leap (TV series)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, RockGypsy! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bangelfire\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 14:47, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BeiderbeckTrilogy.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BeiderbeckTrilogy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:25, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Heather Mills has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 19:12, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Heather Mills, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 19:14, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Heather Mills. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. The Helpful One ^(Review) 19:34, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fiona Phillips

the name of the article is fiona phillips, so phillips should be in the lead..if frizzel is her name now then the article should be moved to that name. daveh4h 20:27, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I just decided to put her married name in parenthesis. daveh4h 20:30, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Hi, I've noticed a couple of your edits to articles on TV series and personalities. Some of them really don't sit that well, for example this one, this one or going back further this one. The problem is that it comes across as you inserting your personal opinion about UK TV personalities into articles. Sometimes those comments are pretty derogatory and you really need to look (again?) at WP:OR, WP:BLP and WP:RS. Content here needs to be written in an encyclopedic, neutral tone and to be well sourced. On a more trivial and patronising point of language construction, actors and actresses usually appear in a TV series, or join the cast during a particular season, not "within" one. Thanks --Nickhh (talk) 11:53, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]