Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jacurek

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 08:54, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Supporting evidence:It is highly probable that User:Jacurek is revert warring and evading his 4 month block for socking, block evasion and disruption [1] as IP 154.20.146.225 and IP 70.79.12.228 at History of Jews in Poland [2]. Besides the same pattern of editing, most convincing evidence that IP 154.20.146.225 and Jacurek is the same editor is here: Jacurek forgets to sign his post at talk page [3], IP 154.20.146.225 comes to sign it minutes later [4], and vice versa edit by IP 154.20.146.225[5] signed minutes later by Jacurek [6]. IP 70.79.12.228 displays the same pattern of editing and is coming from the same area as IP 154.20.146.225. Editor Jacurek was blocked for socking and block evasion before (see User:Cvc42) and IP 70.79.12.228 continues reverting the same articles with similar edit summaries as sock Cvc42 did: please compare [7] and [8] --- M0RD00R (talk) 08:54, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary The first reason not to file a checkuser request (at the top of WP:RFCU says "Obvious, disruptive sock puppet" -- this is an excellent example of that. CheckUser is not needed when the editing is as obvious as this. Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 14:09, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is rather obvious case. But there do we go from here then. Should I file it at SSP board?M0RD00R (talk) 20:29, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]