Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Luigi30 2
Vote here (1/0/0) ending 21:14 10 September 2005 (UTC) Luigi30 (talk • contribs) Luigi made a failed application for adminship in March, which failed due to an edit count under 1000. He now has 1333, and has been here effectively since last September. He is not the most active of users, but seems cool, rational, and interacts well by my experience on IRC. He is the kind of user I can see doing significant amounts of RC patrol once he has the tools that adminship gives (in my own mould). My own formula for deciding whether to support an adminship is to take away the potential costs of promotion from the potential gain. Luigi30 easily passes that test. [[smoddy]] 21:14, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Support
- Me, of course. [[smoddy]] 21:16, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
Oppose
- 1333 edits in a year, thats not much activity, lack or edit summaries and spends too much time on Chess. Jobe6
21:45, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
.svg?lang=en){kind=small}
Neutral
Comments
- Is there is reason for the inactivity? There's only been about 100 edits in the last there months, a fair amount of which were to a chess game. I'm also disappointed at the lack of edit summaries. This seems to be one of those cases where IRC users may have had a good deal of interaction with the candidate, while non-IRC users have not. Carbonite | Talk 21:37, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A.