Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planets of Warhammer 40,000

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fabrictramp (talk | contribs) at 12:31, 12 July 2008 (Listing on WP:DELSORT under Game). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Planets of Warhammer 40,000 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

The mother of them all, this is a massive totally un notable list of planets from the Warhammer 40,000 series which repeats plot information from other Warhammer articles in an in-universe way. It is therefore duplicative, massively trivial, and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 05:26, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

          • Seriously, after having this one silly argument, along with the rest of them, completely shattered in dozens of AfDs recently, why do you even bother? That book obviously does not provide the necessary content to satisfy policies and guidelines (i.e. not your personal opinion on how this site should be managed). You're entitled to your own opinions, but constantly harassing people in AfDs that are backed by policies and guidelines is not helping you at all. Make your comment and leave it at that. If you see a bad comment like "Delete - This is crap" then you can do your thing. Otherwise, just focus on changing the policies and guidelines. TTN (talk) 03:36, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
            • Because I have yet to see you make a valid argument for deletion in any AfD, which is why most of your argument are completely shattered in dozens of AfDs. This article covers a topic that satisfies any reasonable policies and guidelines and we get by now that your personal opinion of this site is incredibly exclusive, but most editors reject that limited vision. That book shows that aspects of Warhammer are indeed encyclopedic. In fact, encyclopedic enough to be covered a published book, which not all fictional universe can claim. But not just in that book, but also in these which can be use to make a good article. Should this article be improved further? Absolutely. Should it be deleted right now as it never can be improved further. Of course not. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 03:41, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
              • I really don't recall having any of my arguments ever shattered except for the period when I was an inclusionist out of ignorance towards the true purpose of this site. I have certainly "lost" in them before, but that's more because of numbers than anything. Again, we're not talking about how you think this site should be managed. We are talking about current guidelines and policies, not your imaginary versions of them. If your statements were correct, fiction would not constantly be progressing towards an encyclopedic standard. I just realized that I'm being stupid by trying to argue with you, so that'll be it from me. TTN (talk) 03:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no non-trivial coverage by reliable verifiable sources independent of the topic to demonstrate any inkling of notability. Primary sources don't cut it. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 07:19, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Planets in WH40K are regularly "discovered" when GW wants to introduce a new battleground or race or nationality or whatever, and nuked just as quickly when it suits GW. They're snippets of plot most WH40K players don't know about and aren't interested in. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 08:31, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 12:31, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]