User talk:Banana04131/Archive 1
Welcome!
Hello, Banana04131/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
- If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
Hi, I noticed you created a new article on Prescott Farm. However, I think you were talking about the wrong farm. Since you seem to be particularly interested in creating new articles, I suggest you read Manual of Style to get a handle of how Wikipedia articles are usually formatted. Once again, I say welcome to Wikipedia! — Ambush Commander(Talk) 03:29, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
See reply on your talk page. --Banana04131 17:50, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
You are the most recent editor on this article. I would recommend moving it to "Paiute War" to conform to the more common usage of the name. Or, it may be a better segment of the Paiute article itself. Please look at my notes on the talk page. Comments are welcome. And welcome to Wikipedia. I look forward to working with you. WBardwin 02:51, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
- I would merge (cut and paste) the content of both the article and discussion page (if useful) into Paiute and then make Pah Ute War a "redirect page" to Paiute. That will ensure that someone typing in that spelling will go to the bigger article. For instructions on merging and redirects see: Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages. I think it would make a nice subsection in the bigger article. And there seems to be sources online and elsewhere there to work with. Let me know if I can help. WBardwin 03:44, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
Will do. Thanks! --Banana04131 16:54, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
Jumped in and corrected the redirect page. Take a look at the difference -- you don't need to hit the shift to create the appropriate bracketts. Sorry if I interfered. On Wiki, most of us get into the habit of correcting things when we see them -- otherwise you might never get back to it. Tell me to butt out if you want. Thanks. WBardwin 19:42, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting it. I didn't really know what I was doing. --Banana04131 20:23, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
- In a way, that makes Wiki more fun. You can flub up something and, with the history feature, go back and fix it. It took me quite awhile to realize which key elements were responsible for which functions. Even after six months, I learn a new one every once in a while. Some of these guys, however, are really wizards with this system. Look forward to reading your section of Paiute -- my best.............WBardwin 21:00, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
Thanks
Paul foord 01:29, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
Caral
Aloha. I've replied to your comment on Talk:Caral. --Viriditas | Talk 09:40, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you dear friend Banana04131 for the Award and also for your kind words. Best Regards! --GalaazV 18:01, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
P.S. - Btw, how is your skill in English language? If it is high enough :) do you a few minutes (hours) you could spare to aid revise an article I've rewritten?
- All right, thanks! :) I have added several data and completed the article Rosicrucian, which is under nomination for "featured article" at Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Rosicrucian, in order to comply with suggestions given there. But as my English is rather basic I need a thorough review on the sentences and words spelling to be done: please, you may change sentences to a more formal English but please try do it in a way that the meaning stays the same. If you have any trouble with any conception please ask at my talk page. I had also asked to RDF to aid with a revision, but I think that he is with work at this time, he would do a correction later on; but if you help there is no need for him to do a deep/thorough correction. Afterwards, after english correction, I will comment in the voting page for the changes to be evaluated in order receive green light to become a "featured article". What do you say? :) Thanks. --GalaazV 0:48, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
Will do! --Banana04131 00:12, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
- - I will too, thanks. :) --GalaazV
- I edited around half of this article but for some reason my edits wern't saved! Grrrr...--Banana04131 03:02, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
- - LOL, an event that also took place during my edits in the last week :-) --GalaazV 16:17, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- - Btw, when you finish revising the English usage, please write "Done." under the last item (not striked) at the box "Pending tasks for Rosicrucian" of Talk:Rosicrucian. Then we'll see what follows at the Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Rosicrucian :) --GalaazV 17:50, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- - LOL, an event that also took place during my edits in the last week :-) --GalaazV 16:17, 19 September 2005 (UTC)