Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Sinclair (2nd nomination)

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 18:35, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Jim Sinclair

Previous VfD. Does not appear to be notable. Having an "anti-cure perspective" does not make one notable. Writing an essay that is " widely distributed over the Internet" might make one notable - the problem is that the only references to it I found are on activist websites... which makes sense, since, well... he's an activist :). Around 650 google hits. [1] At worst maybe this article is finally cleaned up a bit.Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 10:06, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. He is vocal enough in his "anti-cure perspective" to be notable. See this link [2] in the NY Times. Pilatus 15:18, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Where is Jim Sinclair mentioned in the article? I can't find any mention of him.... Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 17:56, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
    • He is quoted on the second page of the article: "What they're saying is their goal is to create a world that has no people like us in it," said Jim Sinclair, who did not speak until he was 12 and whose 1993 essay "Don't Mourn for Us" serves as a touchstone for a fledgling movement." That should establish his standing, shouldn't it? Pilatus 18:05, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Thanks - that's enough for me. Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 18:35, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.