Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peccability
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Uncle G's major work 'bot (talk | contribs) at 20:12, 25 September 2005 (Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Peccability moved to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peccability). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 20:12, 25 September 2005 by Uncle G's major work 'bot (talk | contribs) (Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Peccability moved to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peccability)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 15:36, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
Original research or random musings. jni 07:35, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original research. Martg76 09:21, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to impeccability, about the same thing. -- Smerdis of Tlön 15:28, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete POV sermon. Not that I don't agree. --BDD 00:01, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, POV, original research, Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Megan1967 03:26, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- IMHO this belongs not here/in this form, but as a part of a braoder artice/debate on the entire doctrine of sinlessness & infallibility. This is just one aspect of the broader phenomenon -- Enoch, the Marys, sundry saints and pseudo-saints, and other figures outside the Judeo-Christian span I don't even know well enough to name.--Simon Cursitor 07:37, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.