User talk:Branddobbe
Introduction
Hi, this is a play called Branddobbe's Talk Page. It is a collaborative effort being written by many authors, with Eric Sleator McGill as the editor. Please feel free to add to it. Please, if you have any good in you. I get so lonely. :(
Listen to the Mulholland Drive soundtrack while you read this play in order to understand the mood.
Hello Eric, welcome to Wikipedia. Good work on Vista, California. It's nice to see that updated by a human as it was originally entered by a robot! Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them;
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Angela 03:36, Oct 5, 2003 (UTC)
- Yes, you are doing it right! About making the change so soon- you'll find that quite often happens. Lots of people just watch recent changes to find new things to edit so changes, possibly by more than one person, can occur within seconds. There isn't much that goes through unnoticed! Sorry about spelling your name wrong before. :) Angela 04:25, Oct 5, 2003 (UTC)
Act Three (The Basis Of Which Is A Conversation With Sarah That Goes Nowhere)
LOOK d00d I DID SOMETHING. :-P -flyingcats
- Good job! Now do a user page. -Branddobbe
- No. -flyingcats
- Sary Sary, quite contrary. -Branddobbe
Hi, is there any particular reason why you change the stubnotes to the "msg:" format? Just wondering. --snoyes 07:13, 13 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Act Five (In Which P. A. Zetler Gets Reacquainted With Eric)
Hey, Morris. Yeah, I just got an account a few days ago. I'm doing all right, aside from a little sickness. How's it going with you? -- Djinn112 03:10, Jan 23, 2004 (UTC)
Act Six (In Which Jonathan Mooney Attempts To Communicate Anonymously But With Little Success)
I fear I may disrupt the classic 5-Act Shakespearean nature of your page by commenting. Anyway, you're on my watchlist because you fixed some typos on a Star Trek page I made. Thanks.
Act Seven (In Which P. A. Zetler Responds To A Crisis)
Oops. Well, it's okay now; I put an article up at Mike Doughty, so it works all right. -- Djinn112 23:13, Feb 1, 2004 (UTC)
The official part of the Deletion policy doesn't say there is a limit on who can vote. The proposed part of the policy says "A user's votes will be considered valid if that user has been registered at least one week before the listing, and has at least 25 non-minor article edits logged". Personally, I accept all votes if they appear to be made in good faith - ie - they don't seem to be new accounts created for the purpose of StuffingTheBallotBox. Angela. 20:10, Feb 3, 2004 (UTC)
Act Nine (In Which Fabiform Petitions For Eric's Vote To Be Reversed In The Matter Of The Misuse Of English)
I've rewritten the introduction to List of English words with frequent misuse, I believe that the article is now NPOV enough for wikipedia, and it is a useful resource. Please spare its pitiful life! fabiform | talk 07:41, 5 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- Sniff. Did you read my beautiful examples of how to use the verbs lay and lie? Such artistry! So you don't think that the new introduction is better? All it really claims is that if you write any of the "incorrect" phrases in an essay you'll get it marked as wrong (which I believe is true). It clearly points out that language evolves. I thought the introduction was fair and balanced. But I wont nag you any further. Sniff. fabiform | talk 08:09, 5 Feb 2004 (UTC)
What????
On the Greg the Bunny talkpage, you said just that. Why???? -- user:zanimum