User talk:Ikip

To add

Re: What template is this?

RE: What template is this? thank you.

== October 2008 ==

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on United States presidential election debates, 2008. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Onorem ♠Dil 22:22, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{3RR}} with the page name as a parameter. --Onorem ♠Dil 11:23, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. I'm actually not sure which template it is. That was the twinkle warning for 3RR. --Onorem ♠Dil 16:51, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doh, I found it, it is right before your signature in  Template:uw-3rr Inclusionist (talk) 17:47, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on Request for Arbitration page

"The overwhelming edits of these three user accounts has been to delete well referenced material, while too my knowledge, adding nothing or very little to the article itself."

Good day, I believe, in your statement, you have inaccurately and unfairly included my name. In regards to the content in question on the Joe Wurtzwhateverhisnameis article, I have only removed that content twice. All of my other edits have been either constructive (see all the reference format cleanups) or to enforce other policies (removing weasel words and NPOV violations). I do not consider that to be "very little" contribution. I would appreciate it if you would update your comment on the arbitration page to clarify these facts. Thank you. Dp76764 (talk) 21:59, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is the great thing about wiki, you can edit out your mistakes, my apologies. Inclusionist (talk) 04:22, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Block

Thanks for your note on Mr. Block. I came across the article, and thought the parallels with Joe the Plumber were striking. Pustelnik (talk) 11:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks

Heh. Twinkle can revert edits with one click in just about a second. :-) –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 14:21, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar! It's good to know that people appreciate the work I do. :-) –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 14:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Joe the Plumber

It's quite amazing. Of course, all the protection has done is stop the editing for a while. I wonder when we'll all tire of this one. As an aside, I do wish Arzel would stop misusing the word "libel".Mattnad (talk)

I wish editors would stop abusing acronyms like WP:BLP. You do know veteran editors read their "enemies" talk pages? Inclusionist (talk) 19:33, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. I do it all the time. Mattnad (talk) 20:28, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JP FYI

Thanks!

See also two NYC articles (feel free to add to article):

I've stopped adding to article because it is so volatile that anything you put in gets deleted in a few minutes.

Thanks, Erxnmedia (talk) 20:03, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

For notifying me of the thread. Ohh, and sorry if I've become a distracting influence on the editors there. Master&Expert (Talk) 20:15, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]