Jump to content

User talk:Megapixie/4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:Megapixie
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by OrphanBot (talk | contribs) at 07:37, 5 November 2008 (You've uploaded an image with unknown copyright). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Archive
Archives
1. 29 June 2005 to 6 December 2006
2. 26 December 2006 to 20 October 2007
3. 20 October 2007 to 11 July 2008

Melina_Mores.jpg

Hi, This picture is my own work with Melina Mores from a Canon EOS 30D, and the lack of exif is because the png transformation and resize using Gimp. Should I Really re-upload the file ? Which size (original is 2336x3504 jpg) ? Does the Exif file really must be embeded in Wikipedia content ? Thanks for your help. 82.234.197.125 (talk) 17:38, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

I have responded on your commons talk page, and on the image deletion discussion page. Megapixie (talk) 03:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Memristor.jpg

Thank you for contacting me. I have responded to the request for speedy deletion at Image talk:Memristor.jpg.   — C M B J   03:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

G8 summit

A week ago, some question arose in Wikicommons about the copyright status of a number of G8 summit photos which had been uploaded from the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA). The following images had been tagged for deletion:

  • Fukuda arriving at New Chitose Airport, July 6th - [1]
  • G8+8 Outreach Working Session, July 7th - [2]
  • G8+8 Outreach Working Lunch, July 7th - [3]
  • Tanabata, G8 leaders in a group, July 7th - [4]
  • G8 Working Lunch, July 8th - [5]
  • G8 Afternoon Working Session, July 8th - [6]

I responded to this perceived problem with alacrity, but I did so in a somewhat confused manner. Despite the awkward qualities of the e-letter I sent to MOFA, that attempt did engender a relatively prompt response. I hope it is not premature for me to believe that the necessary permission or release of whatever-it-is has now been satisfactorily documented?

As construed from the perspective of the Japanese government, a MOFA secretariat official has now confirmed that there was nothing improper in what I have already done. Is something else still needed? My limited experience at Wikicommons causes me to wonder if the imprecise words might not be inadequate? If the proffered paragraph is deemed sufficient, what next? I'm not sure what to do about removing those warning notices on the description page which accompanied each image? Perhaps that's for someone else to decide?

I have already posted an update at Commons:Deletion requests/G8 images; but there may be something else I should have done? I will continue to try to figure this out by myself, and I do want to avoid any additional mis-steps at this point.

Will you please help me to confirm that I am doing what is required? --Tenmei (talk) ...a/k/a Ooperhoofd in Wikicommons... 16:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Permission confirmed by MOFA
from [email protected]
to [Ooperhoofd's e-address deleted]
date Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:33 AM
subject Re: 34th G8 Summit -- official photos, permission for use in Wikipedia context
mailed-by mofa.go.jp
Reply
Mr. ... [Ooperhoofd],
Thank you very much for your e-mail. There is no problem you use summit photos in Wikipedia as you do now, which "author" and "permission" are put down on each photo. We do not set an online set of statements concerning the prospective use of summit photos.
Regards,
Secretariat for the G8 Summit
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
重要度 : 普通 発信元 : - <Ooperhoofd's e-address deleted> 日付 : 2008/07/10 06:13:23
宛先 : g8summit-press
件名 : 34th G8 Summit -- official photos, permission for use in Wikipedia context
==> Regarding the letter sent to MOFA -- see HERE for copy of full text.

Further follow-up:
I re-visted Wikipedia:OTRS; and I did send e-mail follow-up to [email protected]. --Tenmei (talk) 17:06, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Could you find a few moments to comment on this? --MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Photographs

Hi I added some of your Photographs to relevent articles, I hope you dont mind; I was boored. --Climax Void ☭. —Preceding undated comment was added at 10:10, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Iraqi S-60 on T-55.jpg

Hello.

Can you please explain to me how are planning to create a free replacement for the picture of this no longer existing vehicle?

Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 16:55, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

I don't know how the lack of knowledge about the photographer is going to help us to make a free picture of a vehicle that doesn't exist anymore. I also don't understand why that picture can't be considered a historical image. BTW I don't know why you think that using text only is going to be better than using an actual picture. Pictures and illustrations always help the reader to better understand the subject of the article or a part of it. Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 22:52, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
"Ultimately the article will still make sense without the picture". Come to think of it you can use this logic to any article on Wikipedia. The only question is would it make the article better? Also I cropped out the vehicle from the picture as you can see so I'm not using the entire picture. Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 23:43, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Fair use?

Regarding the HS.30 article, I've revised the text so that it is not a direct quote of Haworth. I think, though, your comment about fair use is off the mark. Try googling the text I quoted -- it is already available on the internet and has been made so by a commercial organization. Thus, I hardly feel badly about having quoted it on Wikipedia with its original source indicated. --W. B. Wilson (talk) 05:47, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

The link you quoted is interesting but I have to say at the least it is somewhat vague. For example, one could contend that since people use Wikipedia as a reference work, that "Nonprofit educational uses" might cover the quote in question, but as the article notes, nothing is written in stone. --W. B. Wilson (talk) 06:55, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections

Roll call and Coordinator nominations

It's that time of year again – we're wiping everyone's name off of the active members list and doing a project roll call. Your username is listed on the WikiProject Films participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name back to the Active Members list. You can also add your name to any of our many task forces!

It's also time to start the WikiProject Films coordinator selection process! We are aiming to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 07:51, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mobility kill

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mobility kill, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. EyeSerenetalk 12:54, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Firepower kill

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Firepower kill, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. EyeSerenetalk 12:57, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mission kill

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mission kill, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. EyeSerenetalk 12:57, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Catastrophic kill

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Catastrophic kill, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. EyeSerenetalk 12:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Removed PRODs

I notice you've removed the prod notices, suggesting a merge as an alternative. Do you have somewhere in mind? I looked for suitable merge candidates before prodding them, but couldn't really see anything - perhaps you can come up with something... EyeSerenetalk 13:28, 1 September 2008 (UTC) (PS, apologies for the template-bombing; I forgot Twinkle does that :P)

It might be a topic around Armoured warfare - but merging into the main article wouldn't work. Mobility Kill certainly gets reasonable traffic, perhaps merge all the other terms onto there ? Megapixie (talk) 14:10, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
It's a possibility, but still leaves the problem that the terms are US Army jargon (at least, I don't recall hearing them anywhere else!). Maybe a transwiki to Wiktionary would be better? EyeSerenetalk 14:50, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Addendum Looks like someone else has had the same idea. EyeSerenetalk 14:51, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Commons

Bueno, hablo en español, pero seré preciso con lo que sé de inglés. Why you delete this photo? File:BritneyOso.jpg, the source says that the Paparazzi put with a license of cc-by or somethin like that: Look: Or i',m liynig????? Have this license. --Daviddavid0100 (talk) 19:20, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Seriously, didin't think so... 'Cause he is a Paparazzi and take a lot of pictures. The only one that he have in this license is from britney spears, really, look the other one have a lot of copyright license, again, the only who don¿t have is the britney pic. Thanks and please, answered me on this page. --Daviddavid0100 (talk) 22:44, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Ok, perhaps is so obviusly...

In other way: this image can be uploaded to Commons? Have license (to wikipedia) and are from red Carpet. Wait your answer. David --Daviddavid0100 (talk) 17:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:PeruSu-25.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:37, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Megapixie/4&oldid=249804969"