Jump to content

Hizb ut-Tahrir

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Amibidhrohi (talk | contribs) at 03:06, 15 October 2005 (Policies of future state). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hizb ut-Tahrir (Arabic: ﺣﺰﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﺮ; meaning Party of Liberation) is a radical Islamist political party whose goal is to establish a pan-Islamic Caliphate. The organization was founded by Sheikh Taqiuddin al-Nabhani, a judge (qadi) from Jerusalem (al-Quds) in 1953.

Hizb ut-Tahrir is dedicated to what it sees as the political unity of Muslims via the re-establishment of the Caliphate (Khilafah), the removal of what the organization considers to be neo-colonialist Western control of "the Muslim lands usurped by the Kuffar [non-believer] from the Muslims." including "Andalus (Spain)," and a return to a state based on Islamic religious law (Sharia). [1] In accordance with that, the party has called for Muslims to overthrow their governments, establish the Caliphate, and declare jihad against Israel. The party has called suicide bombings in Israel "legitimate" acts of "Martyrdom." [2].

The party is banned in every Arab country, except the UAE, Sudan, Lebanon, Yemen throughout the former Muslim Soviet Union states of Central Asia, and in Germany. On August 5, 2005, Tony Blair announced the British government's intention to ban the group in the United Kingdom. [3] [4]

Aims

The aim of Hizb ut-Tahrir is to unite all Muslims in a single pan-Islamic state or Caliphate, which will be ruled by a caliph. This state will have laws, norms, and social mores based on the paradigms of Islam. It will not be a democracy, which the party says is incompatible with the goal of establishing an Islamic state, though the state would "include provisions for voting in an Islamic context." [5]

An-Nabhani has already drafted a proposed constitution, which includes the introduction of the Gold Standard, abolition of usury, limited rights for non-Muslims and Muslim women, the provision that Muslims regarded as guilty of apostasy be executed (see Apostasy_in_Islam), and that non-Muslims. although permitted to be elected or vote in the people's assembly (Majlis al-Shura), will be excluded from elections for the caliph. Only a Muslim male can be elected to what are considered key 'ruling' positions, such as caliph, his two delegated assistants, Chief Judge, the judge presidng over the Court of Unjust Acts, governor, and provincial mayor. Political parties not formed on the basis of Islamic principles would be forbidden. [6]

Methods

Hizb ut-Tahrir has set out a three-stage plan of action to achieve its goals:

  1. Establish a community of Hizb ut-Tahrir members who work together in the same way as the companions (Sahaba) of the prophet Muhammad. Members should accept the goals and methods of the organization as their own and be ready to work to fulfill these goals.
  2. Build public opinion among the Muslim masses for the Caliphate and the other Islamic concepts that will lead to a revival of Islamic thought.
  3. Once public opinion is achieved in a target Muslim country through debate and persuasion, the group hopes to obtain support from army generals, leaders, and other influential figures or bodies to facilitate the change of the government. The government would be replaced by one that implements Islam "generally and comprehensively", carrying Islamic thought to people throughout the world.

Hizb ut Tahrir states on its website: "The party disseminates its thoughts through discussion with the masses, study circles, lectures, seminars, leaflet distribution, publishing books and magazines and via the Internet. We encourage people to attend our demonstrations, marches and vigils." [7]

Policies of future state

Hizb ut-Tahrir's position is that that the state should abide by Sharia (Islamic law) in all aspects of its work. Its draft constitution provides for the penalty of execution as punishment for apostasy (see Apostasy_in_Islam).

Hizb ut-Tahrir,unlike some other traditionalist movements in the Muslim world, promises to gives Muslim women the right to choose a partner freely, as well as the right to vote, to seek employment, and to assume custody of children after a divorce. Under the Khilafah Women would also have the right to stand for election to the people's assembly. Although women may seek employment, they are barred from key positions of ruling such as that of caliph, Chief Judge, judges of the Court of Unjust Acts, provincial governors, and provincial mayors. Contrasted against Western ideals of womens rights and freedoms, the Islamic standards invisioned by Hizb Ut-Tahrir's Khilafah would seem greatly deminished. Article 109 of the party's draft constitution provides for the segregation of the sexes in public institutions such as schools, and during sporting events. They seek to impose the Islamic rules of public dress, which require Muslim women to dress in accordance with khimar and jilbab (see Hijab) but not necessarily with the face veil (Niqab) favoured fundementalist sects such as the Salafi and movements such as the Taliban.

The draft constitution also details an economic system which allows private enterprise, but reserves public ownership of energy resources, health care, and unused farm land. It also specifies a return to the Gold Standard, rather than pegging to the Euro or dollar.

The draft constitution argues that "there is no such thing as a clergy in Islam", that "every Muslim has the right to perform Ijtihaad" (personal exertion to derive Islamic rules), and that "every thing or object is permitted, unless there is an evidence of prohibition" in the Quran. It us 'incumbent' on Muslims to implement hudud law [8] Hizb-ut-Tahrir's constitution says that "every individual is innocent until proven guilty. No person shall be punished without a court sentence" and that "torture is absolutely forbidden and whoever inflicts torture on anyone shall be punished".

The draft constitution maintains that under Caliphate, "Arabic is the language of Islam and the sole language of the state". The only sources of legislation to be considered divine, and therefore to be accepted without debate, according to Article 12, are those based upon fair interpretations of the Quran, the Sunnah, the consensus of the Sahaba (known companions to the Prohet Muhammad ), and legitimate analogies (Qiyas).

Article 186 of the draft constitution states: "The State is forbidden to belong to any organisation that is based on something other than Islam or which applies non-Islamic rules".They also view the UN, the World Bank, and the IMF and the Arab League as contradicting Islamic law and according to article 186 of the draft constitution ". Hizb-ut-tahrir views current International organisations such a the IMF, the World Bank, the UN, and the World_Trade_Organization as oppressive to the the developing world [9].

Article 56 of the draft constitution states that Jihad is a compulsory duty for all Muslims. Muslim males past the age of 15 are obliged to undergo millitary training in preparation for it. At least as far as Article 56 is concerned, "jihad" refers purely to religious warfare, and subsequent articles in the draft constitution detail rules regarding territory gained by the Khilafah during Jihad. While many practicing Muslims traditionally hold that definitions of jihad (translated to english, jihad roughly means 'struggle') include both the physical form (taking up arms against an oppressive force, for instance) and the more personal jihad against one's own ego; Hizb Ut-Tahrir considers the later to be a 'linguistic' application of the word, while jihad in the millitary sense is the 'shariah meaning' of the term, and therefore the form of jihad referred to and to be referred to in legal documentation. [10]

Attitudes towards the non-Islamic world

Hizb Ut Tahrir has not been elected to government in any of the countries where the party is active, and therefore it is impossible to establish with certainty what its position in terms of international relations, in practice, would be. Publications on the Hizb Ut Tahrir media websites however show a strong anti-Western sentiment that has been characteristic of most Islamist movements. Amongst the publications of Hizb Ut Tahrir is one that compares the British Prime Minister Tony Blair to the people of the Quraysh [11], the tribe of the prophet Muhammad which turned against him when he founded Islam and then sought to destroy him. An article on the British Hizb Ut-Tahrir website ‘exposes’ the agenda of the British government against “Islam and Muslims”. [12] Titles of books published by Hizb Ut-Tahrir include “The American Campaign to Suppress Islam” [13].

Hizb Ut-Tahrir’s antipathy is not only reserved for the United States or Britain. Following a massive bombing attack on cities in Bangladesh (August 17th, 2005), Hizb Ut-Tahrir responded by accusing India of initiating a campaign to destabilize Bangladesh. Investigation later revealed the terrorist attack was executed by another Islamist movement, Jama'atul Mujahideen Bangladesh.Hizb Ut-Tahrir’s routinely accuses India, along with “Western Colonial Powers” of ‘conspiracy’ against the Bangladeshi people [14], using rhetoric not dissimilar to that used against the United States or Britain in the Middle East and Europe.

Anti-Semitism

Hizb ut-Tahrir has published anti-Semitic material on its websites and in pamphlets. In January 2003, Hizb ut-Tahrir was banned in Germany on charges of anti-Jewish propaganda, a ruling currently being challenged in the German courts. [citation needed] Fadi Abdelatif, Hizb Ut Tahrir's spokesman in Denmark, was found guilty of distributing racist propaganda in 2002. The title of the pamphlet in question was "And Kill Them Wherever You Find Them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out" (from the Quran, Baqarah:191 [15]). [16] The pamphlet, now removed from the group's website, continued:

The Jews are a people of slander. They are a treacherous people who violate oaths and covenants. They lie and change words from their right places. They take the rights of people unjustly, and kill the Prophets and the innocent. They are the most severe in their hatred for those who believe. Allah has forbidden us from allying ourselves with them. "It is only as regards those who fought against you on account of religion, and have driven you out of your homes, and helped to drive you out, that Allah forbids you to befriend them, then such are the Zalimoon (wrongdoers)" [TMQ 60: 9] This is how they used to be. This is how they are now, and this is how they will continue to be. This region, especially for the people of Palestine, has suffered their evil for about fifty years. [17] [18]

Another article entitled "The Muslim Ummah will never submit to the Jews", now also removed from the website, [19] states:

In origin, no one likes the Jews except the Jews. Even they themselves rarely like each other. He (swt) said: "You would think they were united, but their hearts are divided" [TMQ 59:14] The American people do not like the Jews nor do the Europeans, because the Jews by their very nature do not like anyone else. Rather they look at other people as wild animals which have to be tamed to serve them. So, how can we imagine it being possible for any Arab or Muslim to like the Jews whose character is such? ... Know that the Jews and their usurping state in Palestine will, by the Help and Mercy of Allah (swt), be destroyed "until the stones and trees will say: O Muslim, O Slave of Allah. Here is a Jew behind me so come and kill him." [20]

In response, Hizb'ut Tahrir stated:

We reject decisively the charge of anti-Semitism because Islam is a message directed to all humankind. However, at the same time we decisively reject Zionism represented in the form of Israel, and Hizb ut-Tahrir, like the majority of other Muslim organisations, is opposed to the continued occupation of Palestine by the Israeli State. The state of Israel is founded upon a land that it took by force, after it drove out its people, both Muslim and Christian. This is injustice, which we will never accept from an Islamic perspective, regardless of the race of the perpetrators. In Palestine, Islam is in conflict with Israelis — not in their capacity as Jews who historically had lived alongside Muslims in peace and security for centuries — but in their capacity as occupiers and aggressors. [21]

On August 15, 2005, British executive comittee member Dr Abdul-Wahid explained why Hizb ut-Tahrir has now started to remove the material from the party's websites:

[S]ome who do challenge our political views often resort to partial understandings of individual texts that are detached from context — either of the Muslim world or of global history in general. For example, the war rhetoric prevalent in Europe fifty years ago was full of derogatory epithets and proud declarations, but these are no longer seen as appropriate.

Winston Churchill’s “fight them on the beaches” is relevant to Normandy in 1944, not Barbados in 2005; the language of “freedom” used in campaigns for independence today differs between Scotland and Aceh. It would be ridiculous to assume that rhetoric relevant to a population that sees itself under occupation is symptomatic of the viewpoint of Muslims generally, and Hizb-ut-Tahrir specifically, on all issues relating (say) to Jews and Americans. Yet that is all too often what we see in these so-called challenges to our political ideas. In fact, the decision to remove some of our overseas literature from our British website was a considered response to the legitimate proposition that people who read it out of its context might see it as offensive. [[22]

In July 2005, Dilpazier Aslam, a 27-year-old British Muslim and trainee journalist with The Guardian lost his position with the newspaper when it discovered he was a member of Hizb ut-Tahrir and refused to renounce his membership despite rejecting anti-semitism. Citing the anti-Semitic statement discovered on the party's website, Guardian executives decided that membership of Hizb ut-Tahrir was not compatible with membership of the newspaper's trainee scheme. [23]

Prominent members

  • Shaykh Taqiuddin al-Nabhani (founder)
  • Shaykh Ahmed Dauor (Jordanian parliamentarian 1955-1957 now deceased)
  • Shaykh Abdul-Qadeem Zalloum (second global leader, now deceased)
  • Shaykh Ata Abu-Rashta (current global Leader)
  • Jalaludin Patel (Current UK leader) [24]
  • Dr Imran Waheed (British spokesperson) NHS trust consultant psychiatrist) [25]
  • Dr Nasreen Nawaz (British spokesperson) GMP & cancer research [26]
  • Dr Abdul -Wahid (GMP & UK executive commitee member) [27]
  • Shaykh Abul-Hassan (Imam of Masjid as-Sahaba, Khartoum, Sudan spokesman)
  • Mohammad Nafi Abdul-Karim Salih (Prominent Jordanian member, now deceased)
  • Bakr Salem Khawaldeh (Prominent Jordanian member)
  • Bashar Ali (barrister, and presenter on the Islam Channel)
  • Wassim Dourehi (Australia spokesperson)
  • Naveed Butt (Pakistan spokesperson)

See also

References

Further reading