Talk:Obscenity
The following was removed from the article, because Wikipedia is not a dictionary:
It is defined by the public domain 1913 US Webster's Unabridged Dictionary as:
- Obscene: (adjective)
- Offensive to chastity or modesty; expressing of presenting to the mind or view something which delicacy, purity, and decency forbid to be exposed; impure; as, obscene language; obscene pictures.
- Foul; fifthy; disgusting.
- Inauspicious; ill-omened.
Wikipedia may not be a dictionary, but there is nothing wrong with including a definition within an article! Ortolan88
Indeed, Wikipedia articles should begin with a good defintion. Ideally it should be written as a plain English prose sentence, and not contain dictionary-only stuff like parts of speech, extraneous senses, old usage citations, and such. --LDC
Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so a sentence copied and pasted tel-quel from a dictionary, with or without the mention of the source, sounded little elegant to me, unappropriated. Of course, that content can still be included, if coherent, in the article; we should try to explain the concept and not the word. --Gianfranco