Talk:Ford Foundation
Um, okay, not that I'm necessarily saying you're wrong, but PLEASE provide some documentation for this charge, before we have an entry that says NOTHING but that they're a CIA front?!? Graft 15:27 Sep 26, 2002 (UTC)
- Nice edit with the "stated". You're right, the evidence that its a CIA front is -- erm -- not great (I'd like one article that didn't read like it'd been written by a conspiracy theorist -- GWO
Gareth, he's the prosecutor for the Nuremberg trials... fallacy of authority, fine, but you're writing away all testimonials completely if you say this. I think 'war criminal' was adequately qualified (or, we can do that if you like), but the fact that someone intimately involved with the prosecution of war criminals thinks this man could probably be one surely has SOME weight worthy of putting it in the article? Graft
- So, Scott Ritter was an inspector for UNSCOM. That doesn't make his "we found 95%" claim any more valid than anyone else's guess. However, if someone wants to accuse a person of war crimes, I wouldn't want to censor that accusation just because I personally disagree with it. --Ed Poor
By the way, I think the stuff on Bundy should go in a companion article. Any objection? --Ed Poor 14:22 Sep 27, 2002 (UTC)