Jump to content

Talk:Java API for XML Processing

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 203.91.206.167 (talk) at 14:11, 3 December 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconJava Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Out of Date

This article needs an update. JAXP 1.3 is now the current version, and "Mustang" has left the stable as version 1.6. Someone (heh maybe even me) needs to update the article, remove the "Out of Date" template marker, and this discussion. Dr algorythm 00:03, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stax (both API and Sun's SJSXP implementation) was indeed added to Mustang, so I (Cowtowncoder) updated references. But since I'm relatively new contributor, I thought I'll leave marker in initially in case I messed something up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cowtowncoder (talkcontrihhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhbs) 21:00, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Examples

Could we have an example of how to use this technology.

SAX handler

I don't think it's necessary to use a org.xml.sax.helpers.DefaultHandler - that just provides convenient implementations of some of the interfaces which are required to be used. It would be better to say something like "by invoking methods on the ContentHandler, the ErrorHandler, the DTDHandler, and the EntityResolver interfaces, typically provided by an instance of a class derived from org.xml.sax.helpers.DefaultHandler".

I'm not sufficiently familiar with SAX to feel authoritive enough to make this change, though. EdDavies 22:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]