Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Lake Clearwater

Lake Clearwater

This picture is a very beautiful capture of Lake Clearwater, Ontario, Canada. It is crisp and very pretty.

Nominate and support. - Mike 22:19, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I suspect people will find it washed out and a bit out of focus. Debivort 02:09, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Explain?Mike 03:52, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oppose - The colours look bleached (pale), and the picture is not as sharp as it could be. EvilStorm 10:05, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've seen far better lake shots, and besides, the focus of the photo seems to be that tree, rather than the lake itself. I also agree with what Debivort said. —DO'Neil 06:20, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Sadly, no, my breath is in fact, not taken.--Deglr6328 06:21, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I guess I have a unique sense of beauty. Love the sarcasm, Deglr6382. Mike 08:21, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nowhere near FP standard, crisp (by which I mean in focus) it most certainly is not, uninteresting, low contrast - Adrian Pingstone 09:43, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. As mentioned above, the colors are washed out and the contrast is very low. Camerafiend 16:07, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose washed out. Circeus 19:51, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. Flcelloguy (A note?) 02:16, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If you could photoshop it to make the colors a bit more vivid and the picture more crisp, I would vote to support. --Ironchef8000 21:19, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pretty ordinary --Fir0002 07:22, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The original isn't crisp enough and the edit is too saturated. Thryduulf 16:40, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Mike.. don't let all these opposes get you down, k? The edit is unbelievably over-saturated.. both versions are unfortunately not crisp at all. Also poor composition with the tree right there. Consider the thirds rule. This also appears to be taken with either a camera phone or a 35mm (or disposable) and scanned in at a low dpi. drumguy⁸⁸⁰⁰ - speak? 06:51, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]