Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pangender
Probable neologism [1] coined by a webpage or something like that, see Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms... needs evidence to be shown of this word used in print or dictionaries. W.marsh 03:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete neologism; original research Tom Harrison Talk 03:56, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. There are examples of this being used in print and the term seems to be gaining traction. Would vote keep if someone makes a case for it. -- JJay 03:59, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Comments below and burgeoning use in print [2] convince me the article should be retained. Aren't we all just a little pangender? -- JJay 05:43, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Just a question, do the results in your link really mean anything? The word pangender doesn't seem to be present in the pages for the books in your search, and a normal search for pangender reveals nothing [3], you have to turn on some additional search option to get your results, with that option I was able to get results for words I made up on the fly like quasimetalurgy and metagendered. --W.marsh 05:49, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. This term has been used in newspaper articles and is widely used in the queer community and in student/university political organisations. Its a term that is more widely known and has been in usage longer than homoflexible for example. Would vote to keep.Mittens.the.kitten, 03:59, 10 January 2006
- Comment. Keep. I myself am pangender, and it is a common enough term to me.