Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babukishan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Splash (talk | contribs) at 19:00, 10 January 2006 (Reverted edits by 59.182.19.87 (talk) to last version by Drini). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 19:00, 10 January 2006 by Splash (talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by 59.182.19.87 (talk) to last version by Drini)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 23:14, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Krishnendu das aka Babukishan, an Bangladeshi Indian Bengali musician. Originally posted by User:Krishnendu das so clearly self-promotion. Is he notable? (Ignore the copyvio aspect - I am satisfied it is posted by the original author or with his approval.) -- RHaworth 08:52, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Is this {{PotentialVanity}} ? Ian Cairns 10:10, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Does this help to show notability? -- RHaworth 19:40, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Does this help to show notability? -- RHaworth 19:40, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete: A google search revealed an article in Times of India on the person, but other than that, I found only self promotional material. I'd suggest a delete of the article, unless other proofs of notability have been put forward. --Ragib 02:45, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as blatant copyvio from [1] and [2]. utcursch | talk 11:39, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I said please ignore the copyvio aspect. He has posted this or similar all over the web. It is of course an insult to Wikipedia (which should be introduced as a speedy criterion) to post crude copy and pastes from elsewhere. But first, can we please have a judgement on his notability. -- RHaworth 08:36, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I said please ignore the copyvio aspect. He has posted this or similar all over the web. It is of course an insult to Wikipedia (which should be introduced as a speedy criterion) to post crude copy and pastes from elsewhere. But first, can we please have a judgement on his notability. -- RHaworth 08:36, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral, I've never heard of him, but all the same it would be better to ask user:Ragib User:Nichalp/sg 18:23, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- I've done that already. See Ragib's vote above. Tintin 18:31, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- aargh... didn't see. Thanks Tintin. User:Nichalp/sg 18:36, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- As I said in my talk page, I haven't heard of him before, but that may be because he is from West Bengal,India. At least in Bangladesh, he is totally unknown/non notable. The Times of India article is the only neutral claim to notability, other than his quite active self-promotion in different websites. Thanks. --Ragib 21:56, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I've done that already. See Ragib's vote above. Tintin 18:31, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.