Jump to content

User talk:GeneralPatton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by UninvitedCompany (talk | contribs) at 22:40, 20 May 2004 (revert at Vandalism in progress). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.


You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Fix spelling and grammar
None

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.


You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

  • You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
  • If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Again, welcome! - Flockmeal 04:50, Apr 2, 2004 (UTC)

I really liked that photo of Stanley Kubrick. Can I ask where you got it? Meelar 05:07, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)

I like the space images you are adding. Do you think you could copy over the NASA descriptive text onto the image description pages, however? It makes it much easier to use the images more correctly (like setting correct captions, or finding more similar images). Also, the vast majority of NASA images are public domain, so it would be nice if you would put the {{msg:PD}} mark on the description pages as well, so there is no chance of someone deleting the image because they don't know its copyright status.

Again, thanks for all the NIX searching!

Audin 19:49, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Could you say where images come from as well as just saying that they are public domain? Thanks Secretlondon 03:05, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)


All the copyright stuff has been added to all the NASA images.

--GeneralPatton 05:56, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the copyright info about the nasa linedrawings. Now I don't have to deal with trying to email the nasa pr people.  :) Audin 08:16, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)


Hi and welcome! The Roman-related images especially need some attribution and sources, without those we'll have to assume their license does not allow for use in Wikipedia. Stan 23:01, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Of course, I’ll add those in soon, i first wanted to upload the stuff, a lot of it was made by photoshoping old, beginning of the century photo plates, like this one http://www.phil.uni-erlangen.de/~p1altar/photo_html/portraet/roemisch/kaiserzeit/benannt/claudius/claud6.JPG , cleaning them up (both the photos and the statues), slightly coloring, and in the end making them look like this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Claud_1.jpg .

Another great example of this technique are thease two : http://www.phil.uni-erlangen.de/~p1altar/photo_html/portraet/roemisch/kaiserzeit/soldatenkaiser/soldat4.JPG (Original, beginning of the century plate); http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Max_thrax.jpg (cleaned up, colored and cropped).

--GeneralPatton 05:56, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Ako neko mrzi Kucana on ga mrzi ali ako neko podnese tuzbu protiv njega onda je to vec ozbiljnije. Molim da prekines da mucis onaj tekst jer pravis budalu od sebe. Kako je to nacionalisticka smesna propaganda a ispod stoji tekst u kome pise o tuzbi. Zaista ne razumem u cemu je problem? Mozes li da mi objasnis? Zasto da ne stavimo neku informaciju na wikipediu bez obzira da li nam se svidja ili ne ako je ona istinita? Ili mozda treba da skoknem do haga po fotokopiju tuzbe da bi svi bili 100% sigurni?Avala 09:09, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

srbine, nikakav Hag ne diže optužnice protiv Kučana i Drnovšeka, več nekakvi srbijanski radikali tvre da če ih tužiti Hagu. Nije ovo ništa službeno, nego nekakve srbijoze pričaju priče, tako su oni tužili i Albrightovu i Clintona i Blaira i sve živo, a Haag im se smijao. Vi srbi se izgleda ne možete suočiti sa svojim zvjerstvima u svim Vukovarima i Srebrenicama. Pozabavi se ti svojim "đeneralom ratkom". --GeneralPatton 15:46, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

HMMM ako je partija zelenih nacionalisticka partija onda OK ali sumnjam. Svejedno nek im se smeju ali nemoj da brises to. Vi se pozabavite djeneralom Gotovinom i ostalim ustasama koji su pobili i proterali vise od 200.000 Srba! OK? U svakom slucaju bio je rat a nazalost mnogi su bili izmanipulisani da u jemu ucestvuju i da ubijaju svoju slovensku bracu. Deluje mi i da si ti jedan od njih Avala

Ako več treba slovence na nečemu uhvatiti, onda su to izbrisani, gdje su slovenci na desetne tisuča ljudi, Hrvata, bošnjaka, srba, makedonaca ostavili bez ikakvih prava, a u to su umješani i Drnovšek i Kučan. Što se tiče Oluje, srbi ste sami organizirano pobjegli, to se dobro vidi u transkriptima razgovora između martiča i šešelja i ostalih bandita, isto tako kao što ste se sami odselili 1995-96 iz područija BiH koja su prešla pod kontrolu Federacije poslje Daytona, razne Vogošče i Iliđe.--GeneralPatton 19:12, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Koji bre Seselj? Pa on je u Hagu! Njega podrzava 30%srba i to uglavnom proteranih. Nemoj da govoris o organizovanom odlasku kao da za to nije bilo razloga. Imam mnogo rodjaka koji su pobegli a njihovi domovi su zapaljeni ili su u njih useljeni ko zna kakvi toboze heroji a u stvari ustase. Mnogi su i poginuli. Kucan i Drnovsek su se na fin nacin izvukli i ostavili ostatak da ratuje. Ako mislis da ja podrzavam Seselja grdno se varas meni je ta budala smesna ali ne verujem da je on smesan hrvatskim i bosanskim zrtvama kao sto nama nije smesan niti Gotovina niti Bobetko ni ijedan drugi kako kazes bandit. Takodje drago mi je da smo svi oslobodjeni cuvene trojke koja je upropastila zemlju -Tudjman-Izetbegovic-Milosevic kao i sve njihove paravojne "generale". Jedino sto mi je zao sto prva dvojica nisu odgovarala za svoje postupke dok ce Milosevic nadam se da istruli u hagu za sve sto je ucinio sto bosancima sto srbima! Avala

I na slovenackim stranama(pozuri jer je u guglovom keshu): [[1]] [[2]]

I noticed that your name was added to the page Wikipedia:Ustasha_wikipedians by someone other than yourself. After looking at the ustasha article, it seems likely that this was an act of name-calling, which I thought you might want to be aware of. --AaronW 22:48, 6 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making me aware of this, im always amazed at the lengths some people will go just to discredit others. --GeneralPatton 01:16, 8 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]


Why did you take out the political causes of the German General staff being forced into an earlier war than what was logical and planned for? It kmakes the rest of the paragraph absurd. Have you read Goerlitz and Dupuy? Do you dispute their analysis? AlainV 01:31, 2004 May 12 (UTC)

20%?

MOLIM TE MI OBJASNI STA SU HRVATI U OSTALIH 80% AKO SU SAMO 20% SLOVENSKOG POREKLA???Avala 10:04, 12 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Prvo pogledaj linkove...

http://pub37.ezboard.com/fistorijabalkanafrm22.showMessage?topicID=21.topic - srbski forum (Da ne kazes da izmisljam).

http://www.network54.com/Forum/thread?forumid=72855&messageid=1032929106&lp=1032932059 - Hrvatski forum


Samo da znas ovo su ozbiljna medjunarodna istrazivanja, a voditelj projekta u Hrvatskoj je sadasnji ministar znanosti Dr.Dragan Primorac.

Pod 1. nije srbski nego srpski cisto gramaticki to je neka promena kao sto je vrabac vrapci. Pod 2. ovo su samo neka forumska caskanja a taj dr primorac(dr je bez tacke zato sto je DoktoR prvo i poslednje slovo u reci) moze da bude ministar znanosti(nisam siguran ali mislim da je to tehnika ili tako nesto) a opet da lupa gluposti. I u Srbiji ima jedan ministar koji otprilike svakog ponedeljka lupi nesto pa se onda cele nedelje izvinjava i govori kako su ga svi pogresno shvatili. Ako pobede radikali tek ce biti veselo jer tamo nema nijedan koji je normalan.

U svakom slucaju normalno je da Srbi i Hrvati imaju neko poreklo kao sto bi i rusi po takvom istrazivanju bili ko zna sta. Ni za Srbe ni za Hrvate ne zna se pouzdano odakle su dosli. A otkad su ovde zovu se slovenskim narodima.

Po tom principu mozemo da na svaku stranu sa listom naroda stavimo link ka listom majmunskih vrsta jer smo svi od njih nastali. Avala 14:19, 19 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Avala

I've started a RfC page on User:Avala. Since you've been involved in disputes with her, you might want to head over and certify it. Thanks. Snowspinner 19:12, 20 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen and signed it, great work. --GeneralPatton 22:20, 20 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism in progress

I reverted your edit. Describing another user's behavior as "cuntish" is offensive both to that user and to the rest of the community. Please chose a more descriptive word next time, and one that is respectful of the equality of women. UninvitedCompany 22:40, 20 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GeneralPatton&oldid=3666704"