Jump to content

Shays's Rebellion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RexNL (talk | contribs) at 17:03, 26 January 2006 (Reverted edits by 168.254.226.2 (talk) to last version by RexNL). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Background

Shay's Rebellion was led by Daniel Shays, a war veteran. The crisis leading to the rebellion was precipitated by credit problems incurred after the American Revolutionary War, when many of the trade benefits of British colonialism vanished and British companies began to demand payment of debts. This debt ultimately trickled down to consumers, in large part to small farmers. In addition, the tax system at the time was highly regressive. As a result, many small farmers were forced to sell their land to meet their debts, often at less than one-third of fair market price.

Furthermore, Massachusetts rewrote credit schemes at the time, to be staffed by elected rather than appointed officials. These efforts were resisted and stymied by wealthy and influential parties, led by men like James Bowdoin who had strong control of the government because of the property eligibility requirements for office at the time. When Bowdoin was elected governor, many of the people in Western Massachusetts became restless — and thus rebelled. This episode of civil unrest lead to the Constitutional Convention and the "revision" of the Articles of Confederation (More or less, the US Constitution).

Rebellion

Calling themselves Regulators, men from all over the western and central parts of the state began to agitate for change. Initial disturbances were mostly peaceful and centered primarily on freeing incarcerated farmers from debtor's prisons. In the late summer of 1786 the conflict escalated when armed Regulators shut down debtor courts in Northampton, Worcester, Concord, and elsewhere. After the passage of the Riot Act, the Regulators seized arms from the Springfield Armory. Militia groups called out to fight the Regulators often switched sides.

The rebellion eventually gelled into an organized army, led by one Daniel Shays, a farmer from East Pelham and a former captain in the American Revolutionary War. Another leader, Luke Day, was the son of a wealthy family in West Springfield. While the Regulators are usually thought of as a rabble of poor farmers, many of them were members of prominent local families, including the Dickensons of Amherst. In addition, many of the rebels were former soldiers who fought in the American Revolution.

The lack of a standing army under the government of the time (set up by the Articles of Confederation) prevented Congress from sending Federal forces. Due to a lack of funds and some empathy for the Regulators, the Massachusetts legislature was unwilling to approve a raising of the militia. Desperate for a solution, Governor James Bowdoin and a number of Boston-area bankers then assembled 4,400 privately-paid mercenaries (who were later legitimized as a militia) under the command of General Benjamin Lincoln to quell what was becoming an increasingly effective rebellion. When the Regulators heard about the mercenary army, they planned to return to the federal arsenal in Springfield, Massachusetts for more weapons. A column of rebels led by Luke Day was delayed by heavy snows, but were repulsed by forces under Gen. William Shepard, allowing Lincoln's as-yet illegitimate army to seize the armory's weapons first. When the other column of Regulators arrived, an extended conflict between the rebels (of some 2000 men) and the Lincoln's army (of around 4,400 men) followed. In the end, this "Battle of Springfield" resulted in a rebel defeat, although only four rebels were actually killed.

Defeat

Shays and his followers were pursued by General Lincoln's now-legitimate militia to Petersham, Massachusetts, where they were defeated on February 3, 1787. Shays and many of the leaders escaped to Vermont where they were sheltered by Ethan Allen and other prominent Vermonters. Vermont governor Thomas Chittenden is believed to have helped shelter these refugees while at the same time publicly decrying the practice. Shays himself was sentenced to death for treason but he and many other leaders were pardoned by the newly elected Massachusetts governor John Hancock. The breakup of this rebel army was followed by guerilla-style attacks on wealthy landowners, liberation of jailed farmers, arson and the like. The last known battle of this kind was fought in South Egremont. In the end, only two men, John Bly and Charles Rose, were hanged for their part in the rebellion.

In exchange for amnesty, Shays' followers were banned from elected office for three years and were not allowed to serve on juries or vote. Eventually the force for the rebellion was dissipated both by an improving economy and by elections that replaced some incumbents with individuals sympathetic to the rebellion (including many of Shays' followers, despite the ban).

== Constitutional influence == Shays Rebellion strongly influenced the decision to call for the Constitutional Convention of 1787. Fear of uprisings like Shays Rebellion were a motivation for creating a strong central government, especially the creation of a standing federal army. Twelve states sent delegates to the meeting in Philadelphia, and while their purpose was to change the Articles of Confederation, the subject changed to negotiations that were to lead to the United States Constitution. In addition many states moved their capitals to rural regions, where state governments would be better informed of local events and better able to control future uprisings.

See also

Fear of uprisings like Shays Rebellion were a motivation for creating a strong central government, especially the creation of a standing federal army. To: Fear of uprisings like Shays Rebellion was a motivation for creating a strong central government, especially the creation of a standing federal army. future uprisings.

References

  1. Richards, Leonard "Shays's Rebellion: The American Revolution's Final Battle." (2002)