Delete - recipe for wikibooks - Tεxτurε 23:46, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I don't understand -- who wants to delete this item, and why? There was a mention of tartiflette in the French Cuisine article, with a few ingredients listed. Why not a recipe? Maybe the person who proposed deleting it thinks it would be more authentique if it were in French?
A recipe is not enclopedic. There is no content beyond ingredients and mixing instructions. I have nothing against the recipe. It just belongs in Wikibooks with the other recipes. - Tεxτurε 02:55, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I've added an introduction to it. Perhaps that could be kept but the recipe itself moved to Wikibooks? Angela. 07:52, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
What Angela suggested(keep). --Woggly 08:33, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Keep, although the recipe itself could go. — Lady Lysine Ikinsile 10:42, 2004 Jun 21 (UTC)
Keep everything. - SimonP 14:44, Jun 21, 2004 (UTC)
Keep everything. Recipes are fine within the context of an article. Dpbsmith 15:57, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I'm prejudiced, since I'm the guy who wrote the recipe, and I admit that I'm not at all an expert on Wikiquette and what should or should not be included in this massive (and wonderfully worthwhile) undertaking. But my own, fairly common, I think, view of the word "encyclopediac" is that it means "all-encompassing". I know that 4 or 5 years ago, when I first heard of the tartiflette recipe and was trying to track down different versions of it, and perhaps even a definitive version, I would have been very happy to have been able to go to the Encyl. Britannica site, say, type in "tartiflette", and to have had a recipe pop up at me, along with some very interesting information about it such as Angela has added in her introduction. 66.1.40.242 00:18, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
