Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 March 29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Herostratus (talk | contribs) at 21:49, 29 March 2006 (March 29: Oops). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

March 29

Uploaded by Gadget850 (notify). OR; unused image; self-nom- Gadget850 ( Ed) 16:09, 29 March 2006 (UTC)).[reply]
Uploaded by Chozie (notify). UE, also uploaded by vandal--Habap 18:22, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Chozie (notify). UE, and by vandal--Habap 18:22, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Chozie (notify). UE, and by vandal--Habap 18:22, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Chozie (notify). duplicate of Emil christensen.jpg, and by vandal--Habap 18:22, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Retain arguers contend variously that (1) since it being used to illustrate a genre of illustration, the looser {{art}} should apply, and/or that (2) since Wikipedia:Fair Use is a guideline not a policy it may interpreted with at least a bit of leeway, and that the use of this image in this way is consistant with (2a) common sense and/or (2b) the intended spirit of the fair-use exemption for comic book covers and/or (2c) the placement of images in many other articles. Notes:

    1. Image content (image shows a half-naked sever-year-old girl holding a stuffed bear sporting BSDM regalia and a strap-on dildo ) is not the issue here.
    2. Image has many fans. I expect that some may come here and vote, which is absolutely fine. But I contend that this is a copyvio issue and hence shouldn't even be subject to vote. If this is done even the most blatant CV could be retained by vote maybe? Request closing admin to consider.
    3. Image is also used in stub on the artist, Hikari Hayashibara. Whether this is a ploy or not I don't know, but even under more-generous {{art}} images may be employed to illustrate a genre or school (or of course an article on the image itself), but not an artist. So that is not an issue I think.Herostratus 21:46, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Image:Tonyfurey.jpg. The claim that this is a personal photo is false. This image was cut from the larger image at Image:PrizesFullerton.JPG, which has since been deleted, which was a photograph owned by St. Columb's College. This Furey image and the Image:PrizesFullerton.JPG image photo were both being used in order to try to prove notability of the John Fulleton article. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:33, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Image:Fullertonfootball.JPG - uploader claims the image is public domain, but it looks like a newspaper photo and there is no explanation as to who the copyright holder is who has released it. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:34, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]