Talk:Security through obscurity

Sympathetic though I may be to the gist of the text, as written it doesn't seem very NPOV. -- April

Suppose it were divided into three sections: neutral description of the practice; criticism and shortcomings of the practice; defense of the practice. Possibly a fourth section describing the ongoing debate about the level and timing of vulnerability disclosures. I agree that the article shouldn't just start slamming the practice in the introductory paragraph. The pros and cons are important information however. Wesley 13:20 Aug 28, 2002 (PDT)

I agree with most of what's written, but it isn't presented in a NPOV fashion. Wesley's proposed fix seems like a good one to me. Rgamble