Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People for deletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Grunt (talk | contribs) at 20:55, 17 July 2004 (fix tag that should not be shown). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This covers the following:

I only put the notice on the first of these. (Perhaps the category should also get one?)

  • I think I stumbled on someone's joke. Do we even want to keep these? (yes, I thought it was funny) --ssd 17:12, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • It's clearly meant as a joke and is even placed in BJAODN. Keep. Mike H 17:13, Jul 17, 2004 (UTC)
    I agree mostly, but what about the category, redirect pages, and templates? Surely we don't have to keep all that? --ssd 17:21, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)
    It was supposed to be a fully-functional joke, apparently. I am indifferent about keeping the other stuff. Mike H 17:23, Jul 17, 2004 (UTC)
  • I must have missed out on the joke; I'm new here.  :-/ Keep the BJAODN article and remove the others. --Ardonik 18:52, Jul 17, 2004 (UTC)
  • I don't see how this is even remotely funny. Delete this from BJAODN, there's not a thing funny about it. If it's funny to somebody, could you explain what makes it funny? It's just stupid. RickK
  • 'Keep BJAODN variant and delete others. FYI, I created this as a result of a discussion that spiralled out of control on IRC. It originated as a tag in the style of the faux {{insanelydisputed}} tag that can be seen on my user page, and probably makes sense only to the IRC people, but I still find it funny. :P -- Grunt (talk) 20:55, 2004 Jul 17 (UTC)