I ask that you please post talk comments at the TOP of the In Box, rather than at the bottom of the page.

Click here to leave a message for Swatjester/oldstylee.

STOP! Hammertime!

This user thinks that registration should be required to edit articles.

I'm an anti-anon user. This means that if anonymous editors post on my talk page with something stupid, I may ignore or delete their comments . Please take the time to better Wikipedia and register. It's free and takes like 3 seconds. ⇒ SWATJester

Please post comments under the In Box heading. Remember, sign with 4 tildes (~~~~) to show name, time and date. Only 3 tildes leaves off the date, and 5 tildes shows only the date.

Archives: User talk:Swatjester archive1, User talk:Swatjester archive2, User talk:Swatjester archive3.

Inbox

Thanks for notifying me of the reasons for your revert of my edit. I had only added in some comparisons as I had noticed there was already mention made of Romans and Celts for the Imperials and the Bretons, respectively, and I felt if that was to be includable information, I should include some more. -jove

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page. --Nlu (talk) 05:14, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is going on with Travels With Charley: In Search of America?

I'm an administrator on Wikibooks, and the contributors of the content here on Wikipedia have decided to take the path of least resistance and move the squabble over to Wikibooks instead. I sure hope that you didn't encourage that sort of behavior, and would like to stop that if it does occur.

As I understand it, you have a question over the status of this content, and cite Wikipedia policies, yet you wrote that you restored the content on the talk page, but didn't give an explaination beyond that it didn't fit the WP:NOT policies. Is this because it is a study guide? You felt it was a soap box? I guess I'm confused at why you reverted the content, and the contributors felt compelled to move all of the stuff to Wikibooks instead.

I know you are just trying to help maintain Wikipedia, but I don't want to be a combatant in this fight. Help me to resolve this issue if you can. --Robert Horning 17:46, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eh? I had no idea that it moved over to Wikibooks. I cited the appropriate policies on the users talk, but a) it was Original Research which is not allowed at all on Wikipedia, and b) it was possibly copyvio, and c) it did not fit with WP:NOT where wikipedia is not a critical reviewer. I said nothing to them at all about wikibooks. They came up with that one on their own. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 17:59, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Organized Talk

Charlie

Hi, I was wondering if you could post on the charlie talk page, so the user understands what's going on, im not sure they read/understand the edit comments as a newbie. It really does look like a teacher in over their head preparing for a class tomorrow. -- Stbalbach 04:02, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

great thanks. Now that I read it more closely your right. -- Stbalbach 04:07, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. Like I thought, they have good intentions, just poor execution. No need to attack them, but no need to let the policy get violated either. Just inform them so they get it right next time. ⇒ SWATJester

^Ready Aim _Fire! 04:10, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

END OF PAGE!

Do not edit further. All new edits go to the top of this page.

Click here to leave a message for Swatjester/oldstylee.