Jump to content

User talk:66.244.215.162

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 66.244.215.162 (talk) at 19:53, 27 April 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

66.244.215.162 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Schools IP address, and people at this school have no respect!

All your edits have been vandalism up to now.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JoJan 22:26, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Cholera on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Adrian(Talk) 19:31, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --DanielCD 19:31, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Cholera. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Adrian(Talk) 19:37, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April 24, 2006

Your recent edit to Louis Riel was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 19:51, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.  — TheKMantalk 19:58, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --digital_me(Talk)(Contribs) 20:06, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. -- JamesTeterenko 20:07, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --digital_me(Talk)(Contribs) 18:05, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --ZsinjTalk 18:27, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April 27, 2006

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires.

Reason : you've been blocked for 24 hours because of repeated vandalism JoJan 05:13, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]