Talk:Anti-abortion movements/Archive 1
Who is this i***t who keeps redirceting this page? It was originally a re-direct to Abortion. This is a valid page. This guy has to be put in his place. User:Pitchka
again as with the pro choice page perhaps move to pro life (abortion issue) again I am gald to know scott Bakula position on abortion
The pages originally linked to the abortion issue and had no kind of article what-so-ever. Pro-life and Pro-choice are cemented into society. My suggestion is that instead of saying "pro-life (abortion issue)" which is more usual than other uses of "pro-life" I would suggest we leave pro-life as is and for any other uses say, "pro-life (anti-death penalty) or what have you. Franky, I don't even know of another use for the term pro-life at this point.
Neutrality is biased and needs to be stopped.
It is becoming very obvious that the user so-called Neutrality is pro-abortion and does not like the idea that an article called Pro-Life is in exsistence. Every chance he gets he erases the page. Yes, constantly re-directing an existing article is erasing. The very FACT that he does not erase Pro-Choice and turn the page into a re-direct proves his political bias. He should never be allowed to be an administrator because he obviously is NOT neutral!
He started out by claiming he was reverting the article back to the original re-direct to Morality and legality of abortion. But this was not true, the original re-direct brought it to abortion. Since there was a link to abortion within the article on Pro-Life there should be no problem. But Neutrality continued to erase the article. A link to Morality and legality of abortion was even added to the page, but Neutrality again erased the page and made it into a re-direct.
This is disturbing that one rogue politically biased user can erase pages at his whim! He has already done it 6 TIMES! He gives no reasons for these deletions, because does not have any reason outside of his political bias. The article is not breaking any rules that I can tell, and many people have worked on it, including myself! Please, if someone can give me some advice on what I can do to bring this constant problem to the attention of someone who might be able to control this guy, let me know. Thank you. Timothy001
John Kerry is Pro-Choice.
User:Christaylor is correct if the following linked information is correct about Sen. John Kerry - (Not Really! - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kerry_presidential_campaign%2C_2004#Abortion ) He is Pro-Choice. Timothy001 16:18, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
According to a Drudge Report Kerry has flipped to being Pro-Choice!
Another link, this one showing Sen. Kerry playing both sides of the issue.
I think John Kerry's voting record betrays his supposed Pro-Life stance.
I think in light of what John Kerry tells people in his hopes for becoming president, that it is pretty obvious he is indeed pro-abortion. Especially when he made this statement to the Associated Press earlier in 2004, "I am proud that I am the only presidential candidate to pledge that I will support only pro-choice judges to the Supreme Court." Which is quoted from the link below.
I believe that Sen. Kerry really shouldn't be on the list of Pro-Life people just from how he voted and the statements he's made. Pitchka 03:36, Sep 5, 2004 (UTC)
It is clear by his statements that he is not "Pro-Abortion," as in favoring abortion. While he is personally against it, he is also against government interference. Are you saying it is not possible to have strong feelings against abortion, as well as strong feelings against the federal government interfering with a with a womans rights in this matter?
What I am saying if he truly believed that abortion was immoral he would not make the votes that he has in the senate. He even voted against the partial birth abortion ban, when many other senators passed it. He is only saying he is against abortion so he can get the percieved Catholic and pro-life vote. Other people on the list are on the record as being pro-life and have not tried to play both sides of the issue. Why do you want to place John Kerry on this list so badly when you must know deep down that he is not pro-life? I don't get it! Pro-Choice is just another way of saying pro-abortion. Please back you statement up with some links or something.Pitchka 12:36, Sep 7, 2004 (UTC)