User talk:Bobblehead

Welcome!

Hello, Bobblehead, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Dissenting Report

It gets bizzare because the council directed the executive to include the report but the executive branch has done everything possible to suppress the report including refusing to put it on the CACHE web site despite repeated requests by council members for them to do so. -- Coz

Thanks for your help editing these articles. I have the information but am still learning the writing style needed here. I appreciate your help! :-) -- Coz

Maria Cantwell & immigration bill

You wrote: Aside from not mentioning the republicans (which can be added rather easily 23 of 55 Republicans voted for it), what part did you find inflammatory? Only reason I left the Republicans off was because I wanted to show the Cantwell voted with a majority of the Dems.

My response: I think I jumped the gun and was careless and I apologize. I was editing in too many windows at once, and I thought that it was a disguised anti-immigration-bill description. But you did mention increased penalties and such. So, yeah, I'll put it back and re-word. Sorry about that! -- Sholom 18:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -- yes, I saw the previous one, too. BTW, I'm not happy with the previous paragraph either (about voting for Alito). While those who criticize her vote on that have some good points, I think it's a stretch and/or original research to assume that a filibuster would have held. Thoughts? -- Sholom 18:30, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to be working with you . . . yes, we agree it's WP:OR. I'll make that change, too. -- Sholom 19:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting

You (and several others) saved me many keystrokes by reverting the most recent round of trivial/POV H1-B spam. All I had left to do was leave a message on a talk page: see 71.123.40.76. Much thanks from the second largest city in Washington. -- Paleorthid 01:37, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

Next time you want to make a "major" change to an article you've never edited before, verify the regular editors for that page are in agreement with the change

I consider this message really sad; do you honestly consider removing multiple year links a "major" change? See article's talk page. --Guinnog 03:26, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply; that's how these things get progressed I suppose. Just trying to make the article look nicer! --Guinnog 03:38, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV on Gregoire

Hey can you take the POV tag off the Gregoire article. This ditto head is trying to trap me into a 3RV trap.