Jump to content

User talk:Leflyman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Renamed User dSgaUUTyFy (talk | contribs) at 02:22, 17 July 2006 (Your Userfication of My Essays). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Welcome to Leflyman's Talky Page

Please feel free to leave me a message

Hi.

I thought about this a lot before deleting. I'm happy to analyse it. Here's my reasoning:

1. Weight of 'votes'. The following users voted to 'delete'.

Total: 7, 5 experienced voters amongst the 7.

The following users voted to 'keep':

    • Blackrazer, who claims authorship [1]. He has never edited any article on wikipedia other than the subject article and its AfD.
    • Ascarislepis, who has never edited anything except this AfD.
    • JaquesDeMolay, who has never edited anything except this AfD.
    • Anon IP 71.197.57.236, who has never contributed anything other than this vote
    • Anon IP 71.86.197.108, who has never edited anything except this AfD.
    • Anon IP 69.170.2.76 (who voted twice). This IP has never edited anything except Clandestine and this AfD. The IP appears to belong to Donathin [2]
Total: 8, with 2 experienced users among the voters
If I may be allowed to weigh the opinion of the broadly experienced users, it's clear that the consensus is 'delete'. Those who are voting 'keep' are those who are associated with the article.

2. The article was rewritten. The original version was too much like an advertisement. The user who claims authorship originally stated that the article is, or should have been, the product of the subject's advertising staff.

After the rewrite, GassyGuy still questions its inclusion. [3] The basis for deletion is, ultimately, notability. Originally it read a little too much like an advertisement, but I believe that the final version is much better.

I'm happy for it to be taken to a deletion review if you disagree. - Richardcavell 06:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

check user is your friend

FYI, I filed WP:RCU. Next time you can do it too :)). Cheers. ←Humus sapiens ну? 04:00, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hello, hello!

Hi,

I just got your message on Collins. Thanx hugely for letting the discussion comment stand.


Oh, and I'm embarrassed. You mentioned an email on my book. I either didn't get, or more likely, misplaced your email. What did you ask?

Sorry. Brain death comes early in my family.

cheers

mjt

Hello, Leflyman. I've noticed your comments on the crushing landslide on the AfD for Star Wars ship names. I have promptly moved all of it to List of Star Wars ships, and have added a redirect from the deleted page to the newer page. I am working very hard to try to make it a good article. I'm adding context for EVERY ship and SOURCES! I hope you'll be glad to hear that!

I'm not sure if you're a Star Wars fan, but if you are, please contribute!

Cheers!!

RelentlessRouge 20:03, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your application has been approved. Please let me know it you have problems getting it running. --Chris (talk) 16:16, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your Userfication of My Essays

Leflyman, please do not userify my essays. If you feel such an action is appropriate, I suggest you place my essays into the MfD process with your initial vote being one of "userfy." If you are doing so because you have observed the dialogue between PT and I with regards to his personal essays, I would ask that you note that he userfied his essays by his own choice as a result of a mediation process he initiated that I am voluntarily participating in. — Mike (talk • contribs) 02:22, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]