Jump to content

User talk:Deckiller

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lingeron (talk | contribs) at 08:10, 23 July 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to Deckiller's talk page.

Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them ==A descriptive header==. If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia and frequently asked questions.

Archive
Archives
archive 1 (Jul. 15, 2005 - Dec. 14, 2005)
archive 2 (Dec. 14, 2005 - Dec. 31, 2005)
archive 3 (Dec. 31, 2005 - Jan. 16, 2006)
archive 4 (Jan. 17, 2006 - Jan. 27, 2006)
archive 5 (Jan. 27, 2006 - Feb. 3, 2006)
archive 6 (Feb. 3, 2006 - Feb. 8, 2006)
archive 7 (Feb. 8, 2006 - Feb. 13, 2006)
archive 8 (Feb. 14, 2006 - Feb. 16, 2006)
archive 9 (Feb. 16, 2006 - Feb. 23, 2006)
archive 10 (Feb. 23, 2006 - Mar. 1, 2006)
archive 11 (Mar. 1, 2006 - Mar. 13, 2006)
archive 12 (Mar. 13, 2006 - Mar. 19, 2006)
archive 13 (Mar. 19, 2006 - Mar. 26, 2006)
archive 14 (Mar. 26, 2006 - Mar. 31, 2006)
archive 15 (Mar. 31, 2006 - Apr. 7, 2006)
archive 16 (Apr. 7, 2006 - Apr. 14, 2006)
archive 17 (Apr. 14, 2006 - Apr. 20, 2006)
archive 18 (Apr. 21, 2006 - May. 16, 2006)
archive 19 (May. 16, 2006 - Jul. 4, 2006)
archive 20 (Jul. 4, 2006 - Jul. 10, 2006)
archive 21 (Jul. 10, 2006 - Jul. 15, 2006)
archive 22 (Jul. 15, 2006 - Jul. 17, 2006)
archive 23 (Jul. 17, 2006 - Jul. 22, 2006)

CT

Noted. Got a little carried away with the helping. Ryu Kaze 02:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think I let myself do a bit more than I would have otherwise because I know him, sort of kind of. I recognize his name and work from GameFAQs, where we've argued/debated/otherwise conversed before. He's one of the most CT-dedicated people on the planet. Ryu Kaze 02:16, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. I have no intentions of usurping his personal mission and the accomplishment thereof, so I'll try to back off as you have done. Ryu Kaze 02:21, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I think so too. We were real lucky that I found some criticism stuff. The lack of it was really the only thing hurting the page. Ryu Kaze 02:27, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strife = Irony

Yeah, I was at one time searching for a way to repair that article, but now I believe ritrualistic suicide would be more sane. The funny thing is, it wouldn't be that bad of a page IF it wasn't the most cruftastic article on Wikipedia. I would just pray for blanking vandalism. ~ Hibana 05:32, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very impressed with how much FFVIII has improved since the two of you tackled it. With Ryu and Crazyswordsman simulatenously driving for FFVI, I think we'll eventually have an even-numbered Final Fantasy title featurette. ~ Hibana 05:39, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to say I helped with the FA articles, but as I told Ryu I'm terrible with prose and really only work by formatting and copyedits. Plus, it usually takes a feature article nomination for me to review an entire article again and again. I've been meaning to edit Final Fantasy VII in a good way: it needs more references for the negative criticism, the Compilation section needs to be in paragraph format, and there needs to be a subsection in Gameplay on the prominence minigames in the game and their origin for future FF titles. But, I'm no good at it, so I figured I'd wait til' the feature drives are done for the other games to ask for help. I'm sure the two of you could perfect it as well. ~ Hibana 05:54, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

in response to your comment

Lingeron, I thought we agreed to disagree so that this issue did not escalate

I didn't agree to anything.

(I received no response, so thus, it has to be assumed that you agreed)

Receiving no response does not deduct to assuming anything.

Why are you continuing to try and parade my advice around as a threat,

I paraded nothing. I found the threat you made (fallout) a tad disturbing and was discussing it with another editor.

thus escalating matters for the entire community? If people oppose because of the support votes, then we will not have any 75 percent majority, thus resulting in no more administrator promotions. Now please, I ask you to reconsider this viewpoint in fairness.

  1. one oppose vote out of 132 support votes does not constitute 75% of the vote and changes nothing.
  2. I said why I opposed. I still say that. I'm sorry if you don't understand it or don't like it. I stand by it. The more coersion I receive the more against this whole thing I get.
  3. Just come right out and say what you mean by fallout. Just say it.

You said something like you were sorry if you sounded frank. You don't. I am the one who is being honest. If you want to harass me and set the admins after me, go ahead. If you want to block me feel free, I certainly can't stop you. I said the same thing to InShanee. Shannonduck talk 08:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]