Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RaD Man
Vanity. See also Remorse 1981 and User:Radman1. RickK 05:00, Oct 18, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Are you kidding me? Rad_Man is one of the most historical figures in the 'underground' art scene, and led one of the most influential groups of the time. It's like not having Bill_Gates in wikipedia. Seriously. -- Eto 23:58, 17 Oct 2004 (PST)
- Possible sock puppet vote, 6th edit.--[[User:Plato|Comrade Nick @)---^--]] 07:01, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete unless evidence of notability is given. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 07:10, Oct 18, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. All this ANSII crap is vanity. Postdlf 08:00, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity. --*drew 08:03, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity autobiography. jni 12:21, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity IMO. Andrewa 12:23, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Let's say he's the #1 figure in an underground movement. Ok. It's an underground movement. I.e. it is a movement where people don't use their real names, where the people don't document their work. Therefore, it is an entirely unverifiable "scene" and a scene that does not have wide acceptance. And you're outraged that the group isn't represented in an encyclopedia? Huh? Geogre 13:05, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity, hehe. Unless notability can be proven. Nadavspi 18:45, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. It might be vanity, but he has interviews over the last 8 years. Plus a few Google searches shows plenty of information on him. He's seems to be a signifigant enough figure in an art world to be worth keeping. -Lifefeed 19:17, Oct 18, 2004 (UTC)