Talk:EMV
![]() | Numismatics Unassessed | |||||||||
|
I'm not sure, but in my opinion, the second link shoud be removed. (Unnamed)
Merge EMV with CHip and Pin
See also discussion on [Chip and Pin]
- I think they should remain separate. One is UK (Chip and PIN) and the other is World wide 'Standard'.
The safety of the PIN method is not related to EMV (Which is a standard), but to the way it is implemented (i.e using PIN as the verification). It could be in either! Ben 16:09, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Keep seperate. EMV is a technology being deployed worldwide, Chip and PIN is merely the UK implementation of the system.
Agreed. (Sorry, I should really sign up but I'm lazy, you'll just have to trust the above poster isn't me too).
The entries should be kept separate because as already stated EMV is deployed world wide, where as Chip and PIN is currently only deployed in the UK. --Mark.s.burgunder 03:47, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Agreed. CHIP and PIN should not be merged as PIN can exist alone, but CHIP can not exist without PIN. In case of CHIP also we require PIN.