Talk:EMV

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I'm not sure, but in my opinion, the second link shoud be removed. (Unnamed)

Merge EMV with CHip and Pin

See also discussion on [Chip and Pin]

I think they should remain separate. One is UK (Chip and PIN) and the other is World wide 'Standard'.

The safety of the PIN method is not related to EMV (Which is a standard), but to the way it is implemented (i.e using PIN as the verification). It could be in either! Ben 16:09, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep seperate. EMV is a technology being deployed worldwide, Chip and PIN is merely the UK implementation of the system.

Agreed. (Sorry, I should really sign up but I'm lazy, you'll just have to trust the above poster isn't me too).

The entries should be kept separate because as already stated EMV is deployed world wide, where as Chip and PIN is currently only deployed in the UK. --Mark.s.burgunder 03:47, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. CHIP and PIN should not be merged as PIN can exist alone, but CHIP can not exist without PIN. In case of CHIP also we require PIN.