User talk:Rctxtreme

This page is the discussion page for Rctxtreme's edits on Wikipedia. This page is not an open forum for discussion unrelated to Wikipedia. Any user found abusing this page will be blocked from editing.

You are not blocked

You aren't blocked or banned. Someone is just trying to trick you. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin

What do you need an admin for? Hyenaste ^(tell) 02:36, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can't you see that I'm being bullied? So you don't care or what? Rctxtreme

Hey, take it easy. I've cleared some of the nonsense for starters. I'm now looking into the harassment... Hyenaste ^(tell) 02:43, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last time it happened, the person was warned (by me actually). If it continues h may be blocked from editing your page or any page for that matter. But for now, all the vandalism is cleared so you should be fine unless it starts up again. Hyenaste ^(tell) 02:46, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contacting you

What do you need? This is an admin.--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 11:38, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted comments. Thanks. Ryūlóng 07:12, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot remove insults? Rctxtreme 11:00, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

The removed comments are personal attacks and they may be removed without being linked to. Hyenaste ^(tell) 07:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is Dale

heartless? HEARTLESS!!!!? MY MOM AND DAD HEARTLESS!!!? How dare you. My mom was not bullying you! Nor was my dad. Take back what you said right away!!! I had to write this 2:45 in the morning because my mom was very upset about what you said. Certainly no respect talking to adults like that! My dad will be talking to you in the morning. I suggest you take back what you said before he gets seriously angry.

--Surfer dale 07:44, 9 August 2006 (UTC)DaLe[reply]

Reply: It's the truth. You people just want me dead because some people told your parents that I bully others and tell the teacher that they bullied me. Get real. Rctxtreme 09:27, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

What I said is based on Rctxtreme's edits

I can't be blocked coz what I said was based on Rctxtreme's edits calling my parents heartless, mindless people

--Surfer dale 07:47, 9 August 2006 (UTC)DaLe[reply]

AHEM

Read these quotes from No personal attacks page:

Examples

Examples of personal attacks

Specific examples of personal attacks include but are not limited to:

Accusatory comments such as "George is a troll", or "Laura is a bad editor" can be considered personal attacks if said repeatedly, in bad faith, or with sufficient venom.
Negative personal comments and "I'm better than you" attacks, such as "You have no life."
Racial, sexual, homophobic, ageist, religious or ethnic epithets directed against another contributor. (Disagreement over what constitutes a religion, race, sexual preference, or ethnicity is not a legitimate excuse.)
Using someone's affiliations as a means of dismissing or discrediting their views — regardless of whether said affiliations are mainstream or extreme.
Profanity directed against another contributor.
Threats of legal action.
Threats of violence, including death threats.
Threats of vandalism to userpages or talk pages. May be direct or indirect.
Threats or actions which expose other Wikipedia editors to political, religious or other persecution by government, their employer or any others. Violations of this sort may result in a block for an extended period of time which may be applied immediately by any sysop upon discovery. Sysops applying such sanctions should confidentially notify the members of the Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee and Jimbo Wales of what they have done and why.
Posting a link to an external source that fits the commonly-accepted threshold for a personal attack, in a manner that incorporates the substance of that attack into Wikipedia discussion. Suggesting a link applies to another editor, or that another editor needs to visit a certain link, that contains the substance of an attack.

Examples that are not personal attacks

Wikipedians engaging in debate is an essential part of the culture of Wikipedia. Be civil and adhere to good wiki etiquette when stating disagreements to avoid personalizing them and try to minimize unnecessarily antagonistic comments. Disagreements with other editors can be discussed without resorting to personal attacks. It is important not to personalize comments that are directed at content and actions, but it is equally important not to interpret such comments as personal attacks. Specific examples of comments that are not personal attacks include, but are not limited to:

Disagreements about content such as "Your statement about X is wrong" or "Your statement is a point of view, not fact" are not personal attacks.
Personal attacks do not include civil language used to describe an editor's actions, and when made without involving their personal character, should not be construed as personal attacks. Stating "Your statement is a personal attack..." is not itself a personal attack — it is a statement regarding the actions of the user, not a statement about the user. There is a difference between "You are a troll" and "You are acting like a troll", but "You seem to be making statements just to provoke people" is even better, as it means the same without descending to name-calling. Similarly, a comment such as "responding to accusation of bad faith by user X" in an edit summary or on a talk page is not a personal attack against user X.
A comment in an edit history such as "reverting vandalism" is not a personal attack. However, it is important to assume good faith when making such a comment — if the edit that is being reverted could be interpreted as a good-faith edit, then don't label it as vandalism.

Be aware of wikilawyering

This policy can be a prime candidate for wikilawyering, which can be defined as asserting a technical interpretation of the policy to override the principle it expresses. This page is frequently edited and examples and remedies that do or do not appear here may have been edited to suit one editor's perspective, but not be generally agreed to by the community. In the end, common sense is more important than the exact wording in this and other policy articles, including the examples included above.

Rctxtreme 09:18, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Drop Dead!

I'm not gonna bother with you, wait till my dad comes.

How 'bout the police join this case? Rctxtreme 09:23, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

How about NO! Australia police aren't gonna come to U.S.A, They wouldn't even come to the U.S.A if I told Ur minister to drop dead. U think ur so important?

Never said i was. But be aware that it is AGAINST THE LAW IN AUSTRALIA TO DEFAME SOMEONE ON THE INTERNET

Well this isn't Australia is it?

Read your talk page and clean up your act. NOW.

AHEM

I thought this was a personal attack:

Threats of legal action.

You are not blocked

Admin

Contacting you

This is Dale

What I said is based on Rctxtreme's edits

*AHEM*

Examples

Examples of personal attacks

Examples that are not personal attacks

Be aware of wikilawyering

Drop Dead!

*AHEM*

AHEM

AHEM